search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
TRADING SYSTEMS


FX


Figure 5- GBPUSD Daily Market Structure - Trading Liquidity on Pullback


the ‘market maker’ level at 1.0725 within the zone, similar to 1.


3. Price is extended on the previous day, with divergence the next day prior to the 127E.


4. Price moves inefficiently into


the extension zone with dual confluence


of a previous daily


volume low, and the ‘repair market maker’ level as described in article 1 (former Olympian and World Cup Bobsledding champion Chris Lori is the best practical resource on trading inefficient order flow in FX).


In most of the examples above, price reacts back into the current and previous daily range, responding at previous levels of transacted liquidity


as described in the Q3 2017 article. Te difference this time is that we are adding extension context for the initial trade back into the range.


Oſten, the problem with these types of moves – price inefficiencies or divergences - is that the inefficient price run may not fill intraday; volume at base or top may be suggestive of the accumulation and markup dynamics


of the higher


timeframe players. Similarly, divergence may only signal pause, not pullback.


Now, using the extension zone, we have a quantified feel for probability under these conditions of uncertainty. To quote Lasse Pederson, the markets are ‘efficiently


inefficient’, allowing enough


anomaly to trade before tightening back into efficiency. Consequently, any percentage information is useful in making the trade decision. Te extension context is important for adding that extra one percent; we know that price is c.80% unlikely to moving beyond the 162 extension. We now have the framing setup – we are using price inefficiency and momentum divergence as behaviours to trade context.


We can now play both sides of the market as discretionary quants.


Graham Harrison Independent trader


Author of “Dynamic Web Programming”


FX TRADER MAGAZINE January - March 2018 45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76