search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
downsmail.co.uk


Local Plan |News


Bearsted borough councillor Denis Spooner, pictured at Woodcut Farm,


Farmsite back on the agenda


A FRESH bid has been made to create an industrial estate on farm- land off theM20 atMaidstone. Roxhill Developments argues


this time that its proposal for Woodcut Farm – off J8 – satisfies fully the use of the site identified in Maidstone Council’s Local Plan. Its outline application for up to


23 B-class commercial units on 19 hectares of open, arable land, is the latest chapter for the green field site, once proposed as the Kent In- ternational Gateway (KIG). Roxhill has reduced the floor-


space of the industrial estate to 45,295sqm – down from the 46,623sqmproposed in 2015 – low- ered roof heights to a maximum 12m and says it will provide a no- development band between it and Bearsted, with landscaping across 60%of the site. Opponents say the suggestion re-


mains inappropriate for the rural area and too close to an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and tourist attraction, Leeds Castle. Resident John Bar- row, fromYeoman Lane, says: “De- velopers have been applying for this site since 2013, in the hope of wearing downMBC, irrespective of merit.” His concern about the isolation of


the site from services and public transport and the impact on con- gestion and pollution is shared by others. Kathryn Kersey, of Green-


sand Road, adds: “It is very curious thatMBC has taken,what seems to many local residents, almost a per- verse delight in designating the area as suitable for commercial de- velopment through the Local Plan. Anyone with an ounce of common sense and who knows the area is very aware that this designation is far fromcorrect or accurate.” Natural England and the


Bearsted and ThurnhamSociety are also vocal opponents of the scheme and the “significant impact” it will have on theAONB. The Bearsted and Thurnham So-


ciety adds: “The proposals are wholly speculative and there is no indication of demand for such usage that requires development to move ahead quickly and in that particular location. Given that the Local Planwill be subject to review with results published in 2021, there is every argument for a deci- sion to be deferred until the review has been completed – especially in the light of the emerging Tonbridge andMalling Local Plan.” The Woodcut Farm scheme has


been consistently opposed by Bearsted’s borough councillor Denis Spooner. MP Helen Whately has asked


communities secretary Sajid Javid to “call in” the Local Plan over con- cerns for rural villages on her patch and on Woodcut Farm, which could blight Leeds Castle.


Local Plan was ‘sound’ - inspector THE Local Plan was the focus of an


examination by independent plan- ning inspector RobertMellor and he reported back to Maidstone Bor- ough Council over the summer. A letter from MBC’s strategic


planning department stated the re- port had concluded that, subject to main modifications, the Local Plan was sound. On Woodcut Farm, Mr Mellor


stated: “Modifying the policy for the strategic employment site atWood- cut Farmto reduce its impact on the landscape and on heritage assets whilst safeguarding office provision. Modifying policy for employment


development in economic develop- ment areas in the countryside and for development involving the ex- pansion of existing rural busi- nesses.” Resident and long-time critic of


the council, Keith Young, said: “Valu- able lessons must be learned from the sad mistakes they have ploughed on with, right up to the final version.” County Cllr Gary Cooke said: “It’s


a missed opportunity in the sense that it doesn’t have at its heart an integrated transport strategy for a relief road (for southMaidstone) at the soonest opportunity.”


Will, Estate or


Power of Attorney Power of Attor dispute? Do


Do you have a e a dispute regarding how a W ill,


Estate or Power of Atto ney has been handled? Whitehead Monckton has considerabl


or Power of Attor experience in helping


experience in helping clients toients to r esolve these difficult disagreements and in many cases achieving excellent financial results.


ton has considerable ping clients to


We can offer a ‘NO WIN – NO FE Will, Estate and Power of Attor


l, FEE ’ service for


and Power of Atto ney disputes. Call us today on


01622 698031


for an initial no obligation consultation by phone. E-mail enquiries@whitehead-monckton.co.uk


www..wh whitehead-monc


Whitehea Monc Englan


itehead Monckton Limite ME14 1BL. Authorised and regu


England & Wales. Regis


Authority under no. 608279. DM2016


Maidstone Weald December 2017 5 gistered offic monckton.co.uk


www.whitehead-monckton.co.uk Limited (no


o.. 08366029), regisistered in fice 72 King Strtreet, Maids on gulated by the Solici


citors Regu


Maidstone, Kent, gulation


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48