search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
downsmail.co.uk


What next, afterM20 lorry park plan axed?


THE Government has dropped plans for a massive lorry park on theM20 – fuelling worries where officialsmight seek to site it next. Whitehall officials decided not to


defend a judicial review and to re- examine all options. Sources say that land near the for-


mer Folkestone racecourse atWest- enhanger, could become a favoured area for development. ElevenKentMPs recentlywrote to


transport secretary Chris Grayling asking for progress on the now re- jected £250mproject. They are fearful, as are the Port of


Dover andhaulage industry experts, that the M20 will grind to a virtual standstill after Brexit inMarch 2019 with Operation Stack a permanent reality. With no border clearance facility


inplace, itwas hopedin some circles that the proposed 3,600 space lorry park at Stanford West, near Folke- stone, could have been adapted. NowHighways England (HE) has


been tasked to find an interim mo- torway solution to Operation Stack and delivery of a lorry park. There is


virtually no chance of delivering the latter before Brexit as plans are un- likely to be submitted before then. HE project director John Kerner


said: “The disruption that people in Kent suffered in summer 2015 un- derlines the need for long-term im- provements to how traffic is managed when cross-channel serv- ices are interrupted. “ All options will be considered by


HE but StanfordWest still remains a possibility as does another site on the London-bound side motorway as most freight clearance work will be for food imports. Applications will be made under


the Planning Act which would re- quire a time-consuming environ- mental impact assessment, which the failed scheme failed to carry out


and ultimately cost it any chance of success. Roads Minister Jesse Norman


said: “…we need to go through the proper procedures to ensure our plans, which include a lorry park, best fit the needs of Kent and the freight industry.” The lorry park, announced two


years ago by former Chancellor GeorgeOsborne in the 2015 autumn statement,metwithlocal opposition. The new plans for a permanent


solution to Operation Stack will be drawn up by HE before a public consultation next year. HE says that Operation Stack can


be avoided on theM20 usingmove- able or steel barriers to safely stack lorries in the centre of themotorway whilst keeping the road open.


All LOADS Ltd Loose or Bags 01622 873 231


Specialists in supplying aggregates


• Top Soil • Turf • Sand & Ballast


All Bags £40


Free Delivery 1 FREE Bulk Bag Waste Collection


www.allloads.co.uk email:aggregates@allloads.co.uk


Maidstone Weald December 2017 27


Buy 5 Bags of Topsoil GET


News


MPs call for end to traffic burden


MP Helen Grant said: “I am very disappointed, to say the least, at this further delay. The people and businesses of Kentwill have to con- tinue shouldering the burden of Britain's lorry transport woes whilst Highways England slowly unzips its pencil case. “I will be writing to them to ask


why this new process is going to take until 2019 before a planning application can be submitted. Most of the options have surely al- ready been investigated, following the appalling 'Summer of Stack' in 2015, which cost the UK economy £250m.” MP HelenWhately said: “I have


foundHighways England reluctant to consider innovative solutions. “The newproposal to hold lorries


in the middle of the motorway using mobile barriers, while allow- ing traffic to continue to travel in both directions, suggests to me they are being much more ambi- tious in their thinking. Thiswill be a temporary solution, and we still need a proper alternative to Oper- ation Stack. “TheGovernment is nowgetting


straight on with trying to get a lorry park approved through the normal planning process.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48