search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INTERIORS


Underpinning the evolution of the modern workplace


With the evolution of modern offices arguably having come full circle, Jeremy Broadhead of Heckmondwike considers how flooring has addressed workspace trends


of much debate, discussion and research. In fact, research conducted by the Chartered Association of Building Engineers indicates that the workplace environment accounts for 24 per cent of job satisfaction and can affect performance by up to 15 per cent. However, with many industry professionals declaring open plan office design obsolete, it is time to consider how the workspace of the future would look like and what design challenges it would pose for architects.


T


From open plan to cubicle and back


Open plan offices first appeared in Germany in the 1950s as a way of creating a non-hierarchical working environment where all staff could sit together, thus fostering communication and collaboration. But open plan in its truest sense didn’t last very long; as early as the 1960s, office furniture manufacturers saw an opportu- nity to redefine the workspace and used advancements in manufacturing techniques to create modular office systems that consisted of structural panels. When assembled, they made a workstation designed to provide workers with both privacy and the opportunity for interaction. In the UK, the office cubicle became widely embraced during the 1970s and continued to dominate the office landscape when personal computers became common- place. During this period, the use of carpet tiles that were functional, hard-wearing, easy to maintain and replace, became widespread.


At the start of the new century, the emerging dominance of digital technologies in the ‘dotcom’ era ushered in a more flexible approach to working and the workspace. Hot desking and the virtual office were born, alongside a generally more flexible approach to the physical workspace.


he impact of the physical workspace on employee productivity, morale and motivation has been the subject


Today, the prime question for architects


isn’t about the viability of a certain type of design, but how to successfully employ aspects of closed and open plan offices in a new kind of workspace. This approach has brought the hybrid office to the fore; it combines the best of both design typologies and can be adapted to suit an organisation’s specific needs.


Sound & colour


Advancements in flooring manufacturing techniques have also highlighted a role for carpet beyond just covering the floor. Research shows that poor acoustics negatively affects employee productivity, stress levels and morale, leading to a 5-10 per cent decline in performance when undertaking tasks that require concentration. Investing in a floorcovering with acoustic properties at planning stage is therefore a very wise move. Fibre-bonded carpets, for example, can help reduce sound transmission between different floors, thus keeping noise to a minimum. A further consideration is the use of


colour, as this has been found to encourage creativity and productivity and to boost morale in the workplace. Different colours provoke different psychological and physiological responses, so careful choice of carpet is becoming increasingly important for office areas, breakout spaces and boardrooms. Use of particular shades has been shown to maximise productivity and minimise fatigue, as well as stimulating creativity and team working. Carpet is also used for walkways, area demarcation and zoning larger, open plan spaces, and also to bring a sense of individuality and personalisation to smaller, compartmentalised spaces.


Custom choice


So, if the office of the future is already here, what can emerging technologies in flooring offer in the future? Increasingly,


ADF SEPTEMBER 2017 WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


83


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100