search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
2 The Hampton Roads Messenger


Volume 11 Number 10


More than half of midsize SUV headlights tested rate marginal or poor


Projector headlights use one lens to spread the light out, while reflectors have multiple surfaces that bounce the light forward. All the good- and ac- ceptable-rated headlight variants in this group of midsize SUVs have projector lenses, and the three good-rated headlight variants are HID. Tat said, having HIDs and/or projector lenses doesn’t guarantee good or acceptable performance in IIHS evaluations.


Te XC60 is available with ARLINGTON, Va. — New midsize


SUV ratings from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety show that headlights are improving when it comes to visibility, but many still need to do a better job of lighting the road ahead while limiting bothersome glare.


Te 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe and


the 2017 Volvo XC60 are the only models available with good-rated headlights among the 19 midsize SUVs and 18 midsize luxury SUVs evaluated in this new round of tests. Twelve SUVs are available with headlights rated acceptable, while 23 aren’t


with anything other than marginal- or poor-rated headlights.


Tis is the fourth group of vehicles


IIHS has evaluated since launching headlight ratings in 2016.


“As a group, midsize SUV


headlights perform slightly better than the other SUVs and pickups we evaluated last year, and that’s encouraging,” says IIHS Senior Research Engineer Matt Brumbelow. “Still, we continue to see headlights that compromise safety because they only provide a short view down the road at night.”


Since few consumers test drive a vehicle at night before buying, IIHS


headlight ratings help shed light on this basic, yet essential crash avoidance


technology. Nighttime


visibility is critical to highway safety because about half of traffic deaths occur either in the dark or at dawn or dusk. Differences in bulb type, headlight technology and even something as basic as how the lights are aimed all affect the amount of useful light supplied. Properly aimed low beams light up the road ahead without temporarily blinding drivers of oncoming vehicles.


available In the Institute’s evaluations,


engineers measure how far light is projected from a vehicle’s low beams and high beams as the vehicle travels straight and on curves. Glare for oncoming vehicles also is measured from low beams in each scenario to make sure it isn’t excessive.


Headlights can vary by trim line,


so vehicles oſten come with multiple headlight variants. Te 37 SUVs that IIHS evaluated have 79 possible headlight combinations.


Most headlights use one of


three different light sources: halogen, high-intensity discharge (HID) or LED. Each of these can be paired with either reflectors or projector lenses.


optional curve-adaptive HID projector headlights, which earn the top rating. Curve-adaptive headlights swivel with the steering wheel to better illuminate bends in the road. Te XC60’s HID headlights also can be purchased with optional high-beam assist, which helps increase high-beam use by automatically switching between high beams and low beams depending on the presence of other vehicles. Models equipped with high-beam assist earn extra credit in IIHS ratings. Consumers who


want One of the good-rated HID


headlights on the XC60 need to buy the Advanced package or the Active Dual Xenon Headlights package.


the worst midsize SUVs


for visibility is the Kia Sorento. Te Sorento’s curve-adaptive HID projector low beams fail to provide adequate visibility on the straightaway, leſt curves and the gradual right curve. On the right side of the straightaway, for example, the Sorento’s low beams only illuminate 148 feet, compared with 315 feet for the XC60’s low beams.


Te Ford Edge is another poor


performer. Te Edge’s base halogen projector and optional HID projector low beams provide inadequate visibility in all test scenarios, including the straightaway, on sharp curves and on gradual curves. Te high beams on both versions have inadequate visibility, too. Both types of the Edge’s low beams also produce unacceptable glare. Te halogen low beams, for example, put more light in the eyes of oncoming drivers on a straightaway than on the leſt side of the road.


When headlights produce a lot of glare, it doesn’t necessarily mean they


July 2017


do a good job lighting up the road for that vehicle’s driver. When equipped with halogen projector headlights, the Edge and the Buick Envision would rate poor based on either glare or visibility alone.


More than half of the 79


headlight variants evaluated have too much glare. In 17 of those cases, the headlights would be rated poor based on glare alone. Complaints about glare from oncoming headlights are common,


research by the National


Highway Traffic Safety Administration indicates.


challenging SUVs and


“Managing glare can be more for


taller pickups vehicles because like their


headlights are mounted higher than on cars,” Brumbelow says. “Better aim at the factory can minimize glare.”


optional


Te Hyundai Santa Fe Sport’s curve-adaptive


HID


projector low beams have the most downgrades for glare among the midsize SUVs evaluated. Te other two available headlight packages also create excessive glare, and all three are rated poor.


In contrast, glare isn’t a problem


for either of the headlight packages on the Hyundai Santa Fe, which is a distinct model from the Santa Fe Sport and has different headlight designs. Te curve-adaptive HID projector headlights with high-beam assist, part of the Tech Package, earn a good rating. Te Santa Fe’s base halogen headlights earn a poor rating because of inadequate visibility.


Te best available headlights


on two midsize SUVs made slight improvements over earlier tests IIHS conducted as part of nominations for a 2017 TOP SAFETY PICK+ or TOP SAFETY PICK award. Te Nissan Pathfinder’s LED headlights and the Volvo XC90’s adaptive LEDs improved to marginal from poor. Tose changes weren’t enough to boost the two TOP SAFETY PICK winners to the higher award category. Vehicles need good- or acceptable-rated headlights to qualify for a 2017 TOP SAFETY PICK+ award.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16