search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FX MONETARY POLICIES


Japan is actually doing it, without triggering inf lation. As noted by fund manager Eric Lonergan in a February 2017 article, “The Bank of Japan is in the process of owning most of the outstanding g o v er n men t debt of Japan (it currently owns around 40%).” Forty percent of the US national debt would be $8 trillion, three times the


amount


of federal securities the Fed holds now as a result of q u a n ti ta ti v e easing.


Yet


the Bank of Japan, which is actually trying to


generate


some inf lation, cannot get the CPI above 0.2 percent.


the economy? We see at least two reasons. First, the Fed needs to raise rates so that it has room to lower them when the next recession occurs. And second, by acting early, the Fed


growth, the result has been to trigger a recession. So why raise them? As observed in a June 2 editorial in The Financial Times titled “The Needless Urge for Higher B o r r o w i n g Costs”:


In this context, the apparent dete rmination of the Fed in particular


to


press on with interest rises


looks


rate a


In his presidential campaign, Donald


Trump attacked Janet Yellen personally for keeping rates low, putting her career in jeopardy


likely hopes to choke off inflationary pressure before it starts to build.


The Hazards of Operating on the Wrong Model


The Deloitte report asks:


Since the anticipated impact of higher interest rates is slower growth, the question becomes: why would the Fed purposely act to slow


28 FX TRADER MAGAZINE July - September 2017


Rates need to be raised so that the recession this policy will trigger can be corrected by lowering them again – really? And what inflation? Te Consumer Price Index has not even hit the Fed’s 2% target rate. Historically, when interest rates have been raised in periods of tepid


little peculiar. Having created e x pe c t a ti o n s that it was likely to tighten policy with three quar t e r -p o int increases over the course of 2017, the Fed is acting more like a party to a contract that feels the need to honour its terms,


than a central bank that takes the data as it finds them. [Emphasis added.]


In the six months since President Trump was elected, the Fed has pressed on with two rate hikes and is proceeding with a third, evidently just


because it said it would.


Impatient bond investors are complaining that it has found one


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69