IS SUE S


PRACTICAL HINTS FOR REDUCING THE EMRs REACHING YOUR BRAIN


According to industry figures, a person holding a mobile phone to the head receives 500,000 times more radiation than the typical background level. Here are the three most significant measures that anyone can take to reduce the possibility of adverse effects.


1


Hold your mobile phone as far away from your


head as is practical; at arm’s length if it has a ‘speaker’ mode. The same applies to cordless phones.


2


Use a hardwired ‘ethernet’ (RJ45)


connection between your computer and modem. Most ‘wireless’ modems still have the appropriate sockets. Remember to then disable the Wi-Fi function in BOTH the computer and modem, in their respective software interfaces.


3


Let the ‘inverse square’ law work in your favour.


Field intensity drops off exponentially with distance from the source. Maintain a prudent distance between yourself and any emitter of EMR.


This information has been used by permission of www.EMRaware.com where you will find dozens more helpful suggestions for reducing EMRs.


26 JULY 2016


This is the central question: “Can we really count on our cells,


through Darwinian evolution, having an automatic protective shield against power-frequent electric and magnetic fields, radio and TV signals, microwaves, etc., i.e. environmental exposures that have never been around on our planet, or, if they have, at less than one quintillionth in strength?” And the answer is so simple: Of


2016 [2] has shown that rats exposed to mobile telephony for two years have an increased incidence of aggressive brain tumours (gliomas) and malignant heart tumours (schwannomas). No tumours at all were observed in the unexposed control group. This project has been underway for


more than a decade, and, with a $25 million price tag, is the most expensive ever undertaken by the NTP. The study involved more than 2,500 rodents, exposed to the same type of radiation found in cell phones, at the same frequencies, for nine hours everyday, for two years. Even though the cancer incidences were regarded as low, transferred to the human population scale such a result still would mean – down the road – a tremendous future cost for the world’s health care systems. The study outcome could result, in the decades to come, in an additional 150 million extra human cancer cases worldwide, something not easily swept under the carpet. The scientists must have regarded


their results of very high importance since they released them before the entire study was completed, a rather unusual decision. As a consequence, from now on, it will be very difficult to claim wireless systems to be without risk. To say that the American NTP study is a paradigm-shifting one is actually to understate its importance. The recent massive roll-out of various


wireless technologies should be critically viewed against this background. The last 100 years we have very suddenly been exposed to radio, TV, computers, cellular telephones, wireless internet, light ray tubes, compact fluorescent lamps, and household appliances of various kinds.


course, we cannot count on any such protective shielding since it is just not present. We are more naked than any newborn baby when it comes to such presumed protection.


The largest full-scale


experiment ever Very early I coined the expression that we are all subjected to the largest full- scale experiment ever, and asked the question: “What happens when we, 24 hours


around the clock, wherever we are, allow ourselves and our children to be used as guinea-pigs, whole-body-irradiated by new, manmade electromagnetic fields for the rest of our lives?” This question is more valid and


important than ever, and it is up to our society, with its governments, parliaments and health authorities, to answer it – but they most often don’t.


So it is fair to ask: can we rely solely on our governments and authorities or do we have to take extra personal responsibility?


Based on all the science that is flooding my desk, I say that this sudden exposure to new, manmade electromagnetic fields seems to cause a disturbance of the immune system to result in molecular and cellular damage and tissue repair reduction that would lead to disease and impairment. To suddenly feed a stable biological


ecosystem, like Planet Earth, with astronomical amounts of energy (as compared to the natural background in which life on this planet evolved) will propel cell growth, like cancer, damage the genome, and jeopardise


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72