IS SUE S
Are we really coping with the increasing amounts of airborne radiation?
In 2006, Associate Professor Dr Johansson published a commentary in the Journal of the Australian College of Nutrition & Environmental Medicine with the title, “How shall we cope with the increasing amounts of airborne radiation?” [1] He says that since then science has progressed dramatically, and today there are no doubts any longer that artificial electromagnetic fields are potentially very harmful to us, and to life on the planet.
by Olle Johansson T
he most telling evidence for the dangers of EMRs (electromagnetic radiation) is the fact that the players we
so dearly want to believe are protecting us, years ago all abandoned ship and do not take any legal and economic responsibility at all for future health damage of electromagnetic fields from this so-called ‘safe technology’. Among the ‘sailors’ that have left the boat are the manufacturers, the telecom operators, the insurance companies (by not insuring for health effects of electromagnetic fields), and to a high degree also the radiation protection authorities, as well as the World Health Organization. In addition to this, there are results
from an overwhelming number of studies, including: • genotoxic cellular DNA-damage • disruptions and alterations of cellular functions like increases in intracellular stimulatory pathways and calcium handling
• decreased learning and memory scores
• disruption of tissue structures like the blood-brain barrier
• damage and induced death of nerve cells
• impact on vessel and immune functions
• loss of sperm quality as well as fertility. We are not the only species in
jeopardy; practically all animals and plants may be at stake.
WiFi rollout The conversion to WiFi, and similar
wireless communication systems, is one of the largest technology rollouts in history, and yet virtually no public consultation with citizens or local governments was carried out in advance – completely in contraposition to the Nuremberg Code of Ethics. Parallel to this, the World Health
Organization has classified the following as being possibly carcinogenic (2B): • powerfrequent magnetic fields (by 2001; with reference to childhood leukaemia)
• radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (by 2011; with reference to brain tumours). The recent ruling of the Italian
Supreme Court, that mobiles can cause a brain tumour, definitely means yet another ‘nail in the coffin’. The very recent American National Toxicology Program (NTP) report from
JULY 2016 25
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72