This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Schools & Colleges


be nominated for Non-League Groundsman of the Year. Paul says he tries these days not to get out on the pitches as much, not wishing to intrude in the day-to-day work carried out by Chris. The Estates Department wanted someone who would play an active part in policy meetings and the like, so his job has changed significantly from what it was a year ago. His main role now is to oversee the whole picture.


Chris has the support of Dave Crowe, who started working at the university as an apprentice assistant two years ago after completing groundsmanship studies at Hadlow College, Kent’s principal horticultural study centre. Dave is the fifth apprentice to have worked on the university pitches since the scheme was introduced four years ago. It’s a feeder source for talent, you might say. Two other members of the team are in charge of all amenity grass surrounding the university buildings and student blocks. Regular cutting by triples takes place over nine months of the year. The pitches - grass and artificial - are all on what is known as the Park Wood part of the campus. The grassed area comprises three football pitches, two grass rugby pitches, and an 11-strip cricket square - all of it heavily used, week in week out. The underlying soil is heavy, claggy clay, so drainage is an ongoing problem and drains installed some years ago are only at ten metre centres. Before Paul’s time, they used to have a contractor carry out vertidraining, but now they use their own - both Wiedenmann and Sisis Mega-slit - and pretty much keep on top of it. If waterlogging ever occurs, Chris does not hesitate to put a halt to keep players off, though this is rare. Paul sympathises with the problems he himself had until a year ago, and backs Chris to the hilt with such decisions.


Student football is played to a pretty decent standard, with the first team playing in the East Kent League. All told there are three men’s teams and a ladies team, with season-long mid-week and weekend fixtures. Mini pitches are also made available to Canterbury Youth Football and the Under-16 Academy at Kent’s only Football League club, Gillingham. There is slightly less pressure on the rugby pitches, with fixtures confined to mid-week during term time only. American Football had also been popular with students in recent years and a dedicated pitch set aside for it. This waned and, at the request of those still wanting to pursue it for a handful of games, the hard-hat sport shares one of the rugby pitches. “The biggest problem with American Football is pitch marking,” said Paul. “We had to have number templates made up by staff carpenters. I’m very much a believer in sport for all, but we’re not heartbroken that the game is now off the students’ agenda. One game on the rugby surface virtually obliterated it, so we had to put a stop to it. “Rugby is a running game,” he said, with an engrained empathy. “Its affect on a pitch is more evenly spread. The American game gives a pitch a very central, unforgiving pounding. As turf carers, we’re not sorry to see the back of it.” Paul is also responsible for maintaining the


extensive amenity areas around all of the university teaching blocks and student accommodation. Completing the department team and working for him in these areas are a senior tractor driver who handles all of the flail cutting and hedge work, plus a tree man and a gardener for the bedding. All told his responsibility spans the university’s whole 300- acre site. His work will also include keeping the campus roadways and car parks clear and serviceable. Last winter, this was a massive task and, mercifully, twelve months on, with milder conditions predominating, he and his team are able to concentrate on groundswork duties. The pitches are all the better for it, he says.


“Rugby is a running game. Its affect on a pitch is more evenly spread. The American game gives a pitch a very central, unforgiving pounding. As turf carers, we’re not sorry to see the back of it”


Paul Griffiths, Grounds Maintenance Manager, University of Kent


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148