This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
083 IN ORBIT


Towering over the park, the ArcelorMittal Orbit provides an Olympic Park landmark for the Games and beyond.


When the design for the ArcelorMittal Orbit was initially revealed back in March 2010, reaction was mixed. Here was a tower whose form didn’t fit our preconceived no- tions of what a tower should be; a sculpture whose challenging aesthetic seemed to sit somewhere between the functional and fantastical. For artist Anish Kapoor and engineer Cecil Balmond, the collaborative team behind the design of the structure, this ‘unusualness’ is part of its appeal. “We’re really interested in geometry and the way that form and geometry give rise to structure,” explains Kapoor. “We’ve worked on different forms of tower before, but we thought we could take this one a little further.”


The existence of the tower - a 114.5m high knot of red painted steel, topped by an observation platform - is the result of a chance meeting between London Mayor Boris Johnson and steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal at the Davos international economic forum. Their brief conversation led to an international competition to design a piece for the Olympic park that would serve as a visitor attraction both in games time and afterwards when the Park enters legacy mode; something very iconic, but with which the public could interact. The installation of 250 LED spotlights added an additional element to the tower – continuing its role as a landmark after nightfall. Spots were positioned around the external spiral staircase, the looping lattices, the canopy and viewing platforms areas, with red LEDs used on the painted steel lattice to help deepen their colour. In addition to the static scheme that operates from dusk to midnight, preprogrammed control software triggered a fifteen-minute moving light show every evening, as well as producing special effects to mark major events in and around the Park. Arup’s lighting designers, structural en- gineers and the architects collaborated closely to ensure that the light projec- tors are all discreetly located within the structure and carefully focused and aimed to minimise light spill onto the ecologically sensitive area of the river corridor and limit sky glow. Sophisticated lighting software, RADIANCE, was employed to analyse and predict the lighting distribution over the sculpture and its surroundings to ensure full


compliance with the ODA lighting strategy. Arup’s Electrical and Mechanical Engineers worked with the firm’s lighting designers to integrate all services in a way that has ensured that all cables and wirings are invisible.


After the Games, the Orbit will close while the Olympic Park transitions to legacy mode. When it reopens in 2014, the Arce- lorMittal Orbit will be able to accommodate up to 5,000 visitors a day with a potential to attract around one million people during the first year of operation. Visitors will also experience the metaphor of an orbit after dark; using light to unravel the sculpture’s convoluted form and to grasp its dynamic shape. Arup Lighting Director Florence Lam refers to their approach as using “dark light”. www.anishkapoor.com www.balmondstudio.com www.arup.com


PROJECT DETAILS


ArcelorMittal Orbit, Olympic Park, London, UK Artist: Anish Kapoor Engineer: Cecil Balmond Lighting Design: Arup


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168