This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
DILUTION MODULE continued a b


Figure 2 – a) Dependence of diluted solution on flow rate of microreactor. Split factor (3) and dilution flow rate (0.6 mL/min) were fixed. Only the micro- reactor flow rate (or sample flow rate) was varied from 0.6 mL/min to 6 mL/min. Test compounds: OS and 4-MOS in MeOH. b) Dilution with flow compen- sation approach with the microreactor flow rate from 0.6 mL/min to 6 mL/min.


to achieve the desired dilution ratio (1:100). Results for the modified dilution approach are presented in Figure 2b, which shows improved stability from flow rate fluctuation of the microreactor.


Experimental Materials and methods


Acetonitrile ROTISOLV and methanol (both HPLC gradient grade) were purchased from Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany); octanoic acid (OS) (>99%) was obtained from Merck-Schuchardt (Hohenbrunn, Germany) and 4-methyloctanoic acid (4-MOS) (>98%) was from Sigma-Aldrich (a part of


MilliporeSigma, Darmstadt, Germany). Concentrations of OS and 4-MOS in MeOH solvent were prepared as follows: stock solution 1 (low con- centration) contained 91 mg/L OS and 45.5 mg/L 4-MOS; stock solution 2 (medium concentration) 182 mg/L OS and 91 mg/L 4-MOS and stock solution 3 (high concentration) 273 mg/L OS and 136.5 mg/L 4-MOS.


For every concentration of the stock solution, four dilution ratios were performed in descending order—1:500, 1:300, 1:100 and 1:50. With every dilution ratio, different reaction stages of 3, 6 and 12 min were selected, which corresponded to microreactor flow rates of 4, 2 and 1 mL/min. These


Table 1 – Automatic and manual dilution of OS in MeOH (run 2; solution: 182 mg/L OS + 91 mg/L 4-MOS in MeOH) Dilution ratio


1:500


Automatic dilution Average peak area (4 mL/min) Average peak area (2 mL/min) Average peak area (1 mL/min) Average of all peaks STD


STD in %


Expected quotient Actual quotient


Manual dilution Average peak area (4 mL/min)


Average peak area (2 mL/min) Average peak area (1 mL/min) Average of all peaks STD


STD in %


572,316 558,824 517,558 549,566 78,059 14.20 1 1


833,103 823,043 830,081 828,592 83,829 10.12


AMERICAN LABORATORY 1:300 932,136


1,063,682 1,191,181 1,062,333 152,834 14.39 1.67 1.93


1,348,170 1,488,325 1,339,397 1,391,964 149,546 10.74


1:100


3,677,616 2,819,612 2,909,122 3,168,592 442,335 13.96 5


5.77


3,891,372 3,965,688 3,838,126 3,900,474 293,239 7.52


38 JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2017


1:50


5,962,748 5,963,894 6,054,573 5,993,738 257,865 4.30 10


10.91


6,926,684 6,886,017 6,876,310 6,895,291 596,194 8.65


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68