This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Murphy’s Law


H


The Future of Golf? It’s Rory or Bust


istory moves in chunks of time we can label. Talk to your neighbor, the geologist, and he can dazzle you over cocktails with a rap about the Pleistocene epoch, the Jurassic period and the Paleozoic Era. Good


happy hour chat, that. Or talk to your neighbor, the film buff, and he can


demarcate the arc of a thespian like Robert De Niro. There would be the “Oustanding Early Era,” including his turns in “The Godfather II,” “Raging Bull” and “GoodFellas.” Then there would be the “Curious and Sometimes Successful But Still Curious Foray Into Comedies Era,” including “Analyze This” and “Meet the Parents.” Then there would be the third era, tentatively titled, “Has De Niro Made a Good Film in Years? Era.” Again, healthy chatter. Same with golf. It can be divided into eras, some more glorious than others. Your grandfather can tell you about the “Ben Hogan


Transition Into Arnold Palmer Era” of the 1940s, 1950s and early 1960s, when everything seemed sylvan and romantic. Your father can tell you about the “Golden Bear Era,” when Jack Nicklaus strode across the golf landscape like a majors- winning Tyrannosaurus. And you yourself are familiar with the “Tiger Era,” an eye-popping period in the Earth’s and sport’s history that, like some astronomers concur, ended with The Big Bang—Tiger’s Escalade hitting a fire hydrant in a gated Orlando neighborhood over Thanksgiving weekend, 2009. That brings us to today’s question: What is our next era


in golf, and will it be any good? I’ve got news for the folks at PGA Tour HQ down in


Ponte Vedra Beach. You best pray Rory McIlroy is up for a Jack/Tiger-like dash through the history books, or this next era may be filed alongside the Dark Ages. The PGA Tour can dress up its FedExCup playoffs all it


wants. The Tour can offer as many $10 million bounties as it wants. But—all due respect—when the Billy Horschels of the world and the Bill Haases of the world are the players ultimately kissing those checks while the rest of the free world watches football, the Tour could be headed for a post-


72 / NCGA.ORG / FALL 2014


Roman-Empire-like descent into oblivion. After all, who really remembers Charlemagne? What we love are compelling figures in history, not any


gimmicks or tricks. The Tour has been down this road be- fore. After Jack Nicklaus won the 1986 Masters, there was a fallow decade until Tiger roared onto the scene. That period can be known by its scientific binomial nomenclatures, Faldo annoying-exus, or Norman choking-exus. No, golf fans, history does not look kindly on Nick Faldo’s six majors, or Greg Norman’s several failed windmill tilts. It was an era lacking in magnetic stars delivering the goods. Even a passing meteor like Nick Price, as inoffensive as he was, failed to register. It took Tiger, golf ’s equivalent of the printing


press, to burst golf out of its dark state and into the bright light of stardom. Suddenly, everyone had an opinion on Tiger. Some loved the fist-pump. Some hated it. Some loved the red shirt on Sundays. Some hated it. Some loved the controlled, corporate Nike-fueled image. Some…wait. Nobody like the controlled, corporate Nike-fueled image. Never mind. At any rate, Tiger mattered. Golf, without Tiger, doesn’t matter that much anymore. At least not to the casual American sports fans. Oh, there will always be the lunatic fringe, that miniscule percentage who knows the difference between Ryan Moore and Ryan Palmer; who can pon- tificate mightily on who’s the better Johnson, Dustin


You best pray Rory McIlroy is up for a Jack/ Tiger-like dash through the history books, or this next era may be filed alongside the Dark Ages.


or Zach. I speak, of course, of you and me, dear reader. But without a Rory-fueled run through history, a Rory


Slam, a Rory-steals-Tiger’s-records type run, we golf lovers may be relegated on the spectrum of society to the rank of bird watchers, or “Star Trek”-convention attendees. It’s a competitive sports landscape, full of video game addicts and short attention-span tweeters. Golf is a pastoral, slow-moving 18th century game invented by Scottish men who wore tweed. That may not be a cool selling point to the kids. So we can have all the FedExCup playoffs we want,


or offer cheaper tickets to PGA Tour stops or make PGATour.com sleek and neat-o. But sizzle sells. Palmer sells. Jack sells. Tiger sells. No pressure, Rory. But until another Mozart comes


along, you’re going to have to start shooting for the moon, kid. Otherwise, historians may one day look back on this era and shake their heads, ruefully.


BRIAN MURPHY hosts the KNBR morning show “Murph and Mac” and was the San Francisco Chronicle’s golf writer from 2001-04.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76