60
Legal Focus
JULY 2014
Trade & Customs
This month we focus on Trade and Customs, and the legal implications surrounding it by speaking to Georg M. Berrisch, a German Rechstanwalt practicing EU trade and competition law in Brussels from Baker Botts law firm.
What are the most common types of case you deal with related to Trade and Customs?
Back in 1991, as a young associate, I started representing the Council of the European Union as an outside counsel in trade remedy cases (anti-dumping and countervailing duties) before the Court of Justice of the EU and what is now the General Court. A few years later, I gradually moved into the role of lead lawyer for these cases, and eventually ended up representing the Council in about 150 trade remedy cases before the EU Courts between 1991 and 2013. This was extremely exciting and gratifying work, often involving novel questions of law and, thus, shaping the case law in areas such as the rights of defence, the assessment of requests for market economy status, the effect of WTO law and rulings of WTO panels and the WTO Appellate Body in the EU legal order, or recently, dual pricing practices. Many of the cases also concerned measures that were very controversial politically, for example the anti- dumping duties on shoes or energy saving light bulbs. Having been involved in virtually all trade defence court cases over a period of more than 20 years provided me with a unique perspective on the workings of DG Trade.
When moving to Baker Botts last September, I stopped representing the Council and I now concentrate my trade remedies practice on private sector clients. In fact, several years ago, I had already started representing EU industries as complainants, for example in aluminium wheels from China or seamless pipes and tubes from China. Currently, I am representing three different EU industries as complainant in an expiry review investigation before the Commission and in two court cases before the EU courts, respectively.
In addition to trade remedies work, economic sanctions have been a major focus of my trade
www.lawyer-monthly.com
practice during the past several years. Most of that work involves helping private sector clients to navigate the complex obligations that flow from the sanctions imposed by the EU. This is challenging, because many of the concepts used in the sanctions regulations are vague and poorly defined. Also, enforcement is delegated to the competent authorities of the 28 Member States. To make matters more difficult, the Commission and the Council provide very little, if any, official guidance. Member States authorities often provide no or, worse, conflicting guidance, and there is virtually no pertinent case law.
I am also representing, before the General Court of the EU, an individual who is seeking to overturn his designation in relation to the sanctions imposed against Belarus. In the course of that case I have obtained a good insight on how the Council -- or, to be fair, the Member States -- adopts decisions on sanctions and how few rights the parties affected by these decisions have in the proceedings before the Council.
Fortunately, I sometimes also deal with market access cases, either for companies seeking to enter the EU market or for EU or US companies who encounter trade barriers in third countries. A recent example is that of an EU company that was the victim of discriminatory VAT treatment in China. We were able to demonstrate to the EU Commission that there was a GATT violation. DG Trade then raised the matter with China and China agreed to change its law.
Can you tell me about anti-dumping, countervailing duties, safeguards and other trade remedies in your country?
The EU is a frequent -- but I would also submit measured -- user of trade remedies. The trade remedy instrument most frequently used by the EU is the imposition of anti-dumping duties. Countervailing duties have recently gained
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100