22
Janrain
JULY 2014 brawn
identity The
How social login can help interactive media meet evolving online defamation legislation – and in the process deliver personalised, high quality content for their users. Russell Loarridge, Managing Director, Europe at Janrain, examines why establishing a sense of identity is key to building a strong and compliant online brand.
I
www.lawyer-monthly.com www.lawyer-monthly.com
t’s hardly surprising that online libel litigation is becoming a growth industry. A steady surge in the number of social and digital channels has not only created a rich platform for user generated content, it has exposed internet operators to the increased risk of publishing discriminatory or defamatory opinion. And in the most extreme cases, without the appropriate due diligence and processes to identify and eradicate calumnious comments, a libel lawsuit could be just an errant mouse click away. So how do you strengthen operations to avoid it? It’s a question of identity.
Libel law: the legislative environment Legislation to combat online defamation is evolving. But, though the Internet is a global animal, regulations vary from region to region. In the US, websites that host reviews are generally not liable for defamation under federal law, but may be culpable if a blog post is followed by the publication of a defamatory comment – even if the comment itself was not written by the blogger. Likewise, in Europe web operators face stiff penalties (including custodial sentences) if found in breach of defamation regulations.
In the UK, new libel laws aimed at giving better protection to people expressing their opinions,
came into force in January 2014. The Defamation Act – which applies in full in England & Wales, and in part in Scotland – reflects the changing communications paradigm stimulated by online and digital channels, and is an attempt to reinforce freedom of speech and the right to publish. Furthermore, with the ‘online conversation’ becoming an increasingly global one, the UK Defamation Act limits so-called libel tourism; although the legislative framework for publication in the EU remains the same, individuals from outside of Europe cannot bring an action to England or Wales unless they can prove that they have a significant reputation to defend there.
In fact, ‘reputation’ is, as ever, central to libel law. The new UK legislation is underpinned by a fundamental principle: that a statement is not defamatory unless its publication has caused – or is likely to cause – ‘serious harm’ to a claimant’s reputation. For commercial businesses, this is clarified further: ‘harm’ to a ‘body that trades for profit’ is not considered ‘serious harm’ unless it has caused, or has the potential to cause, that body ‘serious financial loss’. This measure makes it safer for commentators to criticise businesses and means that companies will find it more difficult to use the threat of libel to prevent bad
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100