This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
vious manufacturing technology. Backward compatibility is necessary in some cases due to program certification, but new programs could gain significant improvement by utilizing the newer features available in modern systems. As Henry Ford said, “If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got.” It’s not that aerospace manufac- turing processes have been lacking as evident by the volume of excellent aircraſt produced over the years, but the processes could definitely be more efficient and cost effective.


Improve those RFQs Tird, the majority of RFQs and purchase specifications


are extremely vague and are the equivalent of simply specify- ing “a phone” or “a machine tool.” If a person walks into a store and asks to purchase just a “phone” they might end up being sold a basic old rotary phone instead of a shiny new, sophisticated and feature packed iPhone. Te rotary phone will work, but it will not be efficient in meeting your specific needs of today. Te same holds true for machine tools. “A


The aerospace industry has always been a little slow to adopt new technologies primarily due to the long build cycles.


In general, there are three simple steps that are oſten over-


looked and can improve your end result by making an enormous difference in aerospace manufacturing costs and efficiency: 1. Make the manufacturing process consistent across all equipment in a facility


2. Take advantage of available technology on existing machinery


3. Improve the Request For Quotes (RFQ) of new equipment to better meet manufacturing needs


Consistent Processes First, the majority of part- and equipment-related issues


at facilities are caused by inconsistency. Basic functions that work differently on two similar pieces of equipment sitting next to each other cause confusion and inevitably, a machine crash due to an “unexpected” event. Additionally, supporting different functionality for each piece of equipment is also very labor intensive and increases training and maintenance costs. To avoid this, do an audit of equipment functionality and parameterization. All equipment should have the same basic functionality and feature setup. You don’t have to do this your- self; leading control manufacturers will do this audit for free.


Fully Use Your Technology Second, there are many technologies available in equip-


ment that go unused primarily because the programming methodology is “what you’ve always done.” Features like Tool Center Point (TCP) and smoothing algorithms like High Speed Smooth TCP with Fairing have been around for a decade or more, but very few machines are using these kinds of motion functions. Quality machine tool builders and CNC manufacturers can help you take advantage of these features. So, aſter doing an audit of existing equipment, contact your preferred supplier to help you optimize the equipment already installed and take full advantage of the investment. It’s usually relatively easy to drastically reduce cycle time while improving surface finish if a few process changes are made and the effort is closely coordinated with the CNC experts.


machine tool” will cut parts, but will not be adequate to cut complex aerospace parts. Additionally, the ability to pur- chase sophisticated consumer electronics at the local store and the simplicity of setup has allowed the industry to lose sight of the realities involved with purchasing advanced aerospace manufacturing equipment. In reality, the majority of bid specifications and signoff


tests in the industry today are almost the same as they were 30 years ago. Te NAS machine runoff tests are outdated and do not verify nor validate most of the modern CNC and machine capabilities. A quality CNC vendor is a great, but rarely used, resource to help develop a purchase specification and test a plan to verify if the new equipment is properly configured. Very specific CNC functionality from basic interpolation to probing must be clearly defined in the bid specification with quality testing to verify functionality prior to purchase. Additionally, in the aerospace industry, it’s rare that any


two machines are identical so the serial number of the equip- ment is oſten a single digit, if not “1.” Because of this, there will be a few unexpected manufacturing defects that need to be overcome in machine tools, partly due to the complexity of the equipment, and mostly because the machine is likely the first of this exact configuration. When considering a sched- ule for purchase and installation of a machine tool, plan a conservative window for testing functionality and to allow for the unexpected issues that will occur not due to the quality of the builder or CNC manufacturer, but the custom nature of the equipment. Finally, partner with the best experts you can find. Te


quality of the machine tool builder and CNC manufacturer is evident in the availability of resources and close engage- ment during the purchasing process and just as important, long aſter the purchasing process. So, if you want to improve your end result, follow the three steps above and definitely look closely at the technology and reliability of the machine tool and control you purchase. But, look even closer at the expertise of the support team behind the equipment—your end result depends on it. ✈


Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing 2013 97


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293  |  Page 294  |  Page 295  |  Page 296  |  Page 297  |  Page 298  |  Page 299  |  Page 300  |  Page 301  |  Page 302  |  Page 303  |  Page 304  |  Page 305  |  Page 306  |  Page 307  |  Page 308  |  Page 309  |  Page 310  |  Page 311  |  Page 312  |  Page 313  |  Page 314  |  Page 315  |  Page 316  |  Page 317  |  Page 318  |  Page 319  |  Page 320  |  Page 321  |  Page 322  |  Page 323  |  Page 324  |  Page 325  |  Page 326  |  Page 327  |  Page 328