This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Process Improvement Within Boeing Mesa, where the Apache Longbow AH-


64D attack helicopter is designed and manufactured, we are working hard to expand the science of Lean so that we can account for subtle causes and effects that will serve to improve our quality, profitability and delivery of defense systems. To this end, Value Engineering (VE), Lean “Plus” and Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DFMA) are brought together in a structured, collaborative environment to not only guide de- sign and production, but fully leverage procurement, custom- ers, suppliers and all other stakeholders.


Lean Plus/DFMA/VE Project Results


Legacy, Metal –Before DFMA


Parts Count


Special Tooling Processes


Mesa Touch Labor Recurring Cost Weight (lb)


Cost Avoidance CoRRS (intangibles)


90 65 9


27.5


Proprietary 9.23


Proprietary Proprietary


New, Composite –After DFMA


78 8 7


20


Proprietary 7.88


Proprietary Proprietary


Product design impacts manufacturing, which then


impacts planning, administration, supply-chain manage- ment, service and profitability, concluding in a cycle where future contracts are either awarded or deemed too expensive. Knowing this dynamic, we increasingly concentrate on the role that conceptual design plays in improving everything that follows downstream in the Lean Plus culture. Let me give you an example. Recently, a defense customer requested a new, specific elec-


tronics configuration that also meant creating a corresponding change in the layout of the Apache helicopter avionics bay doors. Te new doors were originally estimated in a metal- bond baseline configuration. Boeing airframe engineers, however, collaborated very early on with Army engineering to study and quantify the benefits of abandoning the older metal- bond bay doors in favor of a completely new composite door. With upfront design as a driving business principle, the


IPTs looked ahead at the full issues and implications of the avionics bay door engineering change order to make an efficient and speedy decision that would benefit its custom- ers. Our IPTs are self-directed and oſten co-located, so that process workflow moves forward with few reversals. In this case, the team completed a current-state, value-


stream map exposing existing areas of potential weakness, waste and opportunity where more modern designs, materials, processes and tooling could outperform past practices. Te


92 Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing 2013


team also deployed advanced model-based 3D systems, simu- lations and benchmarking to find the highest value design. Starting from concept designs, DFMA product simplifica-


tion and cost estimating guided engineers toward the most desirable configuration by identifying areas for lower part count and fewer touch-labor hours in the assembly process. Tis effort, in turn, reduced the likelihood of nonvalue-added scrap, rework and repair occurring downstream. Boothroyd Dewhurst DFMA fits tightly into the Lean Plus


Percent Savings


13 88 22 27


and Value Engineering (VE) methodologies at Boeing be- cause it quantifies trade-off decisions on structural efficiency that teams routinely debate. With fewer parts that incorpo- rate greater functionality, DFMA-driven designs significantly cut down on the organizational overhead and trailing ex- penses that shadow every component an aerospace company produces and sends into service.


~91.5 15


~75 <1 defect/AC


Results for the Avionics Bay Door Te new doors now have modular,


reconfigurable components such as molded-in one-piece louvers, selective laser sintering (SLS) processed nylon


materials, and common off-the-shelf hardware that allows for easy scaling, modification or expansion should future custom- ers require different electronics packages. Te revisions are forecast to reduce detail manufacturing to


approximately 86% of the metal-bond legacy doors. Total part count was reduced by 22% (calculated at component dash- number level, not composite ply-count). Te new designs negate the requirement for legacy assembly methods requiring massive and costly “monument” facilities, assembly jigs and detail fabrication tooling. With the advent of digital model definition and closely


integrated numerical-control (NC) equipment, tooling strings for the new composite doors are roughly 13% that of the metal-bond units. Design, engineering and development re- sources are estimated at roughly 80% of legacy versions. And these estimates are conservative; the IPTs believe the numbers may be even better due to the independent research and de- velopment done up front, which integrate both initial analyses and conceptual layouts.


Downstream Savings from Understanding Cause and Effect Engineers developing the new composite doors also took


into account the ability to readily service and replace parts or assemblies at aviation unit maintenance (AVUM) levels. In fact, today’s engineers analyze the entire product lifecycle in


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286  |  Page 287  |  Page 288  |  Page 289  |  Page 290  |  Page 291  |  Page 292  |  Page 293  |  Page 294  |  Page 295  |  Page 296  |  Page 297  |  Page 298  |  Page 299  |  Page 300  |  Page 301  |  Page 302  |  Page 303  |  Page 304  |  Page 305  |  Page 306  |  Page 307  |  Page 308  |  Page 309  |  Page 310  |  Page 311  |  Page 312  |  Page 313  |  Page 314  |  Page 315  |  Page 316  |  Page 317  |  Page 318  |  Page 319  |  Page 320  |  Page 321  |  Page 322  |  Page 323  |  Page 324  |  Page 325  |  Page 326  |  Page 327  |  Page 328