This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PUBLIC PETITIONS


became Convener of the Parliament’s Public Petitions Committee, I have been reflecting on the work done by my predecessors and trying to think about ways that can be built upon. For example, we have learned


that if our processes are complicated or seem out of touch, it can be off-putting. We have therefore produced simple and easy to use guidance about petitioning and the process to be followed and the committee staff are always more than happy to answer any questions a prospective petitioner might have. We have learned that we need


to try to reach those who, traditionally, may not have been interested in petitioning the Parliament. During the last session of the Parliament the predecessor Public Petitions Committee held meetings out in the community at times and places most suitable for those it was trying to reach. It met across Scotland, from the Borders to the Highlands, in schools and community centres. This work included delivering


presentations to schools to inform them of the role of the Parliament and the impact that politics has and could have on pupils’ day to day lives. It also included working with pupils to support them in preparing a petition on a subject that mattered to them. This led to the committee


just one way in which the Public Petitions Committee is working to ensure that it reaches as many people as possible.


Reaching out effectively to all The committee previously commissioned research to look in more detail at who our petitioners are. It discovered that the vast


majority of petitioners were white middle-class males in their late 50s. While this may be true of the people who are most likely to engage with the Parliament across all subject areas and not just petitions, it is important to recognize that there are large parts of the population who do not engage with politics or the Parliament. That is why, since I


considering petitions on protecting the rights of school age workers, a payment scheme to encourage blood donations and free access for school age children to publicly funded leisure facilities. I believe that by seeing their petitions considered by the committee, people, and young people in particular, see that our petition system gives a voice to individuals which can be heard right at the heart of the Parliament. I am determined that we will


continue to go out into the community. That we continue to meet in places where traditionally there have been low levels of


engagement. By doing his we can show to the people of Scotland that the Scottish Parliament – their Parliament – works for them. I want to continue to show people that they do have a voice and that no matter where they live or what their background, they can be directly involved in the policy making process.


Making a noticeable difference I feel privileged to be the Convener of the Parliament’s Public Petitions Committee which has at its heart the people of Scotland. I am also proud to say that there are many areas in which public petitions have made a real difference, where policies have been changed and where lives have improved for the better. This has included the introduction of new national guidance in response to petition seeking to ensure equity of the provision of cancer drugs throughout all National Health System boards and the introduction of new guidelines on the provision of Vitamin D supplements for children and pregnant women following a successful petition highlighting the issues around a lack of Vitamin D. The purpose of all petitions


systems, from the one developed then by King David, to the one in place at the Scottish Parliament today, is to encourage participation and to allow the public, the people we seek to represent, to have a real investment in the political process. The system has changed as the


country itself has changed. The petitions system and the processes behind it have kept pace with the demands of a modern society. But we must never allow ourselves to sit back and think that the job is done. I believe that it is important that we constantly examine what more we can do for the poor, the dispossessed and the powerless and that our systems constantly evolve to meet these needs.


The Parliamentarian | 2012: Issue Two | 115


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72