This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FREE AND RESPONSIBLE PRESS


BUILDING A FREE AND RESPONSIBLE PRESS THROUGHOUT THE COMMONWEALTH


A major new report on Commonwealth media law by the CPU Media Trust identifies the continued use of legislation and other measures to restrict the freedom of expression in the media, and it recommends steps for governments to take to protect and enhance this fundamental right, says a Member of the United Kingdom House of Lords who is also a leading U.K. media manager.


Lord Black of Brentwood, in


London. Lord Black has been a Conservative Member of the United Kingdom House of Lords since 2010. He chairs the Commonwealth Press Union Media Trust. He is also the Executive Director of the Telegraph Media Group Limited and chairs the Press Standards Board of Finance Ltd which funds the United Kingdom’s Press Complaints Commission. The CPU Media Trust report “The Test of Democracy” can be downloaded from: http://www.cpu.org.uk/ MediaLawReport2012


Media freedom is a contentious subject for many Commonwealth Parliamentarians. It is of course a paradox that when Parliamentarians are in opposition, many vociferously defend the concept of media freedom; but once they get into government, they seek ways of muzzling the media. It’s a paradox that is as old as


democracy and one that is likely always to be with us. But it should not shroud the central issue that a free media is universally recognized as one of the building blocks of a democracy – emerging or established – and therefore needs to be nurtured and encouraged if governments across the Commonwealth are not to be held up to censure. Indeed, as the Commonwealth Press Union stated in its 1999 report – the first


100 | The Parliamentarian | 2012: Issue Two


ever undertaken – on media freedom in the Commonwealth: “…securing the independence of the media in the Commonwealth is absolutely vital if the aims and ideals laid down in Harare in 1991 are to be adhered to. Whether in Nigeria or Uganda,


the U.K. or Canada, India or Malaysia, an independent, responsible press is the sine qua non of a properly functioning modern state.”1


Freedom of the press It is often said that a free media is not a “free” media; it is what is left of the copy by lawyers and by the law. But it is a concept which is considered to be so important that most constitutions enshrine it as a matter of course, not least the United States constitution which forms the basis of so many written


Lord Black of Brentwood


constitutions around the world today. The United Nations Declaration


of Human Rights specifically states, in Article 19: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72