This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
WHEN CHARLES EMELY, PH.D., CAE, CMP, WAS CHARGED WITH THE formidable task of co-locating four separate railway industry events, there was “a certain degree of concern and trepidation.” Would the joint event attract enough attendees and exhibitors? Would the four organizing associations be able to overcome their cultural differences and work together? “We went into this,” Emely said, “not having any idea what to expect.” But four years of planning, negotiating, and persuading paid


off. This past September, Railway Interchange 2011 made its debut at the Minneapolis Convention Center — and was a re- sounding success “from all perspectives,” according to Emely, executive director and CEO of the American Railway Engineer- ing and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA). The organizations initially hoped for 4,000 to 5,000 at-


tendees; they ended up with close to 9,000. And all three trade associations involved along with AREMA — the Railway En- gineering-Maintenance Suppliers Association (REMSA), the Railway Supply Institute (RSI), and Railway Systems Suppliers Inc. (RSSI) — sold out their exhibit space and had waiting lists. Emely said: “Everyone was pleased with the results.”


Riding the Rails “Everyone” included the railroad industry leaders who in the spring of 2007 requested that the four organizations meet in the same place at the same time, creating one all-inclusive event rep- resenting every segment of the rail-supply industry. “The chief engineering people in the major railroads in the country decid- ed they would like to see this be a combined event primarily to


reduce the number of trips that needed to be made during the year,” Emely said. “The intent was pretty clear. When your cus- tomer base says we want you to do this, you consider it a man- date.” But a mandate is one thing. Consensus and acquiescence are something else. “It was not something that [RSSI] wanted to do,” said Michael Drudy, RSSI’s executive director. And the or- ganization “pushed back.” Drudy said: “We tried a similar com- bined show back in 2000 in Dallas, and it was very unsuccessful. The railroads were very reluctant to send their entire engineer- ing staff to the show and, essentially, vacate their offices. So they ended up sending the civil and mechanical engineers and leaving the signal people behind to man the fort. And the signal people are our customers. So we had a noticeable decrease in the num- ber of customers at that combined show.” Eventually, Drudy said, RSSI relented to “pressure from the


railroads” and decided to “go ahead and give it another try.” But Drudy and his counterparts at REMSA and RSI were still ap- prehensive about the potential turnout for what was christened Railway Interchange 2011 and slated for Sept. 18–21. “Co-lo- cating meant that all of the major railroads had to send the ma-


✱ MIXED SIGNALS:


Railway Interchange 2011 brought four railway industry organizations — the American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association, the Railway Supply Institute,


the Railway Engineering-Mainte- nance Suppliers Association,


and Railway Systems Suppliers Inc. — together for the first time


under one roof. The organizations worked together to develop a logo for the combined event.


82


pcma convene December 2011


www.pcma.org


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148