This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
“There’s too much control given to volunteer committees. We think that we’re doing the right thing by allowing them to make these choices, when they don’t have that expertise.”


regional, and national meetings, and whose speakers are also members—vendors or suppliers. This group will sell to the highest bidder every 30 minutes of a half-day meet- ing, to allow these practitioners to get up and present. And sometimes these practi- tioners, these companies, will have six to eight people that will get up in a 30-minute presentation and share their experiences. And it’s just a parade, one after another after another. There’s no thought process whatsoever as to what’s in the best interest of the attendee, or ‘is this meeting the needs of the attendees?’”  “There’s too much power and control given to volunteer committees. The intent is good. But too often the volunteer committees become the people who approve what the table- cloths are going to look like, what the food-and-beverage is going to be, whether or not somebody is going to speak. They literally put the entire power into the committee’s hands— which is backwards, particularly if the conference is some- thing that makes revenue for the organization. The intent is good, because we want to get advice from our volunteers, because they’re the ones in the field. But unfortunately, we give them way too much power. And we think that we’re doing the right thing by allowing them to make these types of choices, when they don’t have that expertise.”


ATTENDEE POV


QuitWasting My Time. (But Keep Your Seat.)


Cricket Snearing,Administrative&TeenTravel Director, Sesame/Rockwood Camps  “I think I’m more selective about what sessions I go to. If it’s not what I want, I’m sort of like, ‘Ooh, why did wehavethis person?’ And when their presentation is not what the write-up says—when they don’t match—that part bothers me.”  “The one thing that I tend not to do—which a lot of people do, and it drives me crazy—is you’re sitting there listening to someone and people start walking out. And I always think, well, almost as bad as somebody is, I’m still get- ting something from it. If I get one idea from somebody, I feel great. I don’t need to have them tell me everything that’s going to change my program.”


CERTIFICATION MADE POSSIBLE


 “Sometimes you get there and you think, ‘Okay, this is a waste of my time; we could have done this on a conference call.’ It wasn’t as planned out as somebody thought it was going to be, in terms of just whether it’s a committee meeting,


not so much a session at a conference.”  “I want people to know what’s going on and stay on track and havethe information begood and quick—and also begood presenters. I think that’s one of the things with a lot of people who think they know the material but they’re not a good presenter. I don’t have a lot of patience for people who don’t know how to manage an audience.”


 THE CONSULTANT IS IN


You AreNot as Important to Your Attendees as You Think You Are. Also, Your Propri- etary Social-Networking Site


Is a Terrible Idea. NathanielWhittemore, Principal, LearnCapital  “The thing that I think conference planners have the hard- est time with is that the owners want as much to happen in the context of their conference as possible—they’d like everyone to walk around all year wearing [conference] T- shirts and starting every sentence with ‘I went to this confer- ence….’ Attendees just want really, really basic stuff. This is just a part of their identity, it’s a part of the stuff that they do every year. And this is even the case with the most exclusive, hard-to-get-into events.”  “At the end of the day, [conferences] own a very, very small piece of any individual’s mindshare. And so the trade-off between having a Ning network…or their own pro- prietary conference community versus just having a Facebook or a LinkedIn group— I think it’s pretty hard to justify at this point.” 


CRICKET SNEARING


62


pcmaconvene December 2011


www.pcma.org


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148