Research Assessment Exercise Results


RAE 2008 The University of St Andrews has emerged as one of the UK’s leading research institutions for the quality of its research across Science and the Arts, according to the results of this latest UK Research Assessment Exercise (www.rae.ac.uk) published in December 2008. The RAE 2008 demonstrated that St Andrews has significantly expanded its complement of world class research since 2001 and is one of Europe’s leading and most research intensive universities.


Subject


Applied Mathematics Art History


Biological Sciences


Chemistry (joint submission with the University of Edinburgh)


Classics


Computer Science Divinity


Economics & Finance English


Film Studies French


Geography & Geosciences German History


International Relations Italian


Management


Medicine (Other Laboratory Based Clinical Subjects)


Philosophy Physics


Psychology


Pure Mathematics Russian


Social Anthropology Spanish Statistics


World


Leading (4*) 25


15 10


30 15 15 20 15 35 50 10 20 20 20 10 5


10


15 40 25 20 5 0


25 10 10


94% of St Andrews’ research activity is internationally recognised and 60% is world leading or internationally excellent.


St Andrews submitted more than 92% of its academic staff for consideration in the RAE 2008, one of the highest submission rates of any UK university.


The table shows the percentage of research activity at each quality level.


Internationally Excellent (3*)


45 60 40


40 45 45 30 40 35 35 50 40 40 40 35 25 50


25 35 40 45 30 20 30 55 50


Recognised


15 45


30 35 35 45 45 20 15 35 35 25 35 35 45 35


35 25 30 35 55 40 30 25 35


Recognised


Internationally (2*) Nationally (1*) 25


5


10 5


0 5 5 5 0


10 0 5 5


15 5


20 25 5


25 0 5 0


10 30 15 10 5


Explanation of Terminology Quality level 4* – Quality that is world-leading in terms of originality, significance and rigour. Quality level 3* – Quality that is internationally excellent in terms of originality, significance and rigour. Quality level 2* – Quality that is recognised internationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour. Quality level 1* – Quality that is recognised nationally in terms of originality, significance and rigour. Quality level U – Quality that falls below the standard of nationally recognised work. Or work which does not meet the published definition of (Unclassified)


research for the purposes of this assessment. U


0 0 0


0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


0 0 0 0 0


10 0 0 0


5


broad daylight


Research Assessment Exercise Results 2008


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195