This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
AGRICULTURE


Figure 4: FAO Food Price Indexes; 2002 - 2004 = 100 500


400 300 200 100 0 Note: The FAO Food Price Index is a trade weighted average of the component indexes 2002-04=100. Source: GIEWS (2011).


“Higher commodity prices are a positive signal to a sector that has been experiencing declines in prices expressed in real terms for many decades and are likely to stimulate the investments in improved productivity and increased output needed to meet the rising demands for food. However, supply response is conditioned by the relative cost of inputs while the incentives provided by higher international prices are not always passed through to producers due to high transactions costs or domestic policy interventions.


In some key producing regions, exchange rate appreciation has also affected competitiveness of their agricultural sectors, limiting production responses.” OECD/FAO (2011), OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2011-2020, OECD Publishing and FAO.


The FAO-OECD clearly has concerns


about current biofuels policies, which broadly it sees as distortions to trade which result in the inefficient allocation of resources. However, its policy recommendations naturally focus on measures directly relevant to the agricultural sector, namely improving productivity growth and establishing means to deal with the sector’s inherent price volatility.


Increased access to market-based instruments are also


recommended, amongst other measures. As small producers do not have the knowledge, assets or access to such instruments, the FAO sees governments playing a more active role in hedging agricultural and associated foreign exchange price risks. However, this recommendation is slightly at odds with where


Increased access to market-based instruments are also


recommended ... slightly at odds with where the report stands on the debate surrounding speculation and commodities


It says, “volatility may be reduced


by measures to increase market transparency and reduce uncertainty, and ensuring that volatility reflects underlying market fundamentals, and not misinformation, speculation, panic or incoherent policies.” Key measures are increased market transparency with regard to data collection and dissemination, as well as reintroducing buffer stocks, although the FAO recognizes the costs involved as problematic.


62 September 2011


the report stands on the debate surrounding speculation and commodities. The report acknowledges that there has been a huge influx of funds and non-traditional participants into commodity markets since the mid-2000s. It notes that the literature on the subject is divided. However, the report ultimately sits on the fence: “Increased financial funds investment in commodity markets has been a persistent feature during the period, although their


influence on commodity price movements remains unclear and would require further research.” Yet, for the OECD, sitting on the fence is a shift in position in itself – towards the view that speculation is a problem. If current thinking continues to move in that direction it raises a dilemma when considered against the recommendation of an extension of market-based instruments as a means of managing market volatility.


Policy Outlook Food and energy are the two most basic human requirements.


Food has the greater potential for sparking social unrest, but blackouts and fuel price inflation are both well documented precursors of discontent. Both have the same basic drivers, and,


Meat Price Index Food Price Index


Cereals Price Index Sugar Price Index


Dairy Price Index Oils Price Index


2000


2005


2010 2011

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96