This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
INVESTING IN COMMODITIES


connections. If the global slowdown continues it is this part of the complex which currently looks the most vulnerable.


The Case For Commodities With global growth stalling many investors are again


from the policies set up by western governments in the 1970s to support agricultural development – the global food equation is now shifting towards chronic shortages. And food and energy prices are increasingly linked in ways which extend beyond the simple pass-through of input costs to agricultural production. Both energy and agricultural sectors now face huge challenges in meeting future demand and mitigating price volatility. To compound matters, biofuel policies are not currently aligned with food security goals – investigated here by RossMcCracken, editor of the Energy Economist with Platts [see page 57]. In the energy sector, oil demand


may be weak but supply seems weaker still. Hussein Allidina, Head of Global Commodity Research with Morgan Stanley recently downgraded their growth forecasts, prompted by disappointing developed world economic data, policy errors in the US and Europe, and the prospect of fiscal tightening in 2012. However, if their analysis is correct – with emerging market growth remaining reasonably firm – global oil demand will continue to grow, albeit at a slower pace, beckoning higher prices [see page 37].


questioning whether commodities (especially gold) are in a bubble. This, you would expect, might make them reluctant to commit new money to this asset class. But recent evidence points to the contrary. While many cyclically oriented commodities have been under pressure and are likely to remain that way, “investors should consider maintaining a strategic weight to commodities as an asset class”, says Russ Koesterich, iShares Global Chief Investment Strategist. Although individual commodity prices can be extremely


volatile, over the past 25 years the volatility of a broad commodity index has been in line with that of developed market equities. Furthermore, across a long-term horizon commodities are diversifying and have historically helped improve the risk/ return characteristics of a portfolio. “While the lack of a dividend or income stream makes commodities difficult to value, we find little evidence to support the notion that the entire commodity complex has entered into a bubble,” Koesterich confirms. “That said, the future trajectory for commodity returns will largely be determined by the macro environment. Over the long- term, commodities – and gold in particular – have historically benefited from inflation and a weak dollar. In addition, the returns of more cyclical commodities like industrial metals are influenced by economic growth.” Koesterich may be telling us what we already know (or what we already believe) but his comments, often repeated elsewhere, could find added credence given what we have already considered.


Arguably, the greatest determinant of commodity performance


A structural increase in raw materials prices is in fact an inevitable consequence of chronic resource insufficiencies ...


Meanwhile, industrial metal prices


have recovered from the recent sell- off. Interestingly here, prices remain closely tied to equities, particularly for copper with its bellwether IP


34 September 2011


is likely to remain the level of real interest rates. Historically, commodity prices have benefited the most not from inflation, but from low or negative real rates, which lower the opportunity cost of holding an asset that produces no income. Perversely, as long-term interest rates fall, even in the face of stabilizing inflation, this is arguably supportive for commodities. To the extent long-term rates


remain low or negative – even in the context of a slow growth economy – this may be the most important consideration for the asset class in general, and for gold in particular,” says Koesterich. And his defence of commodities as an asset class is mirrored elsewhere by professional investment managers.

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96