Solutions Editor’s choice Using modelling and simulation to optimise plant control systems I
ncreased emphasis on more environmentally friendly, efficient and safe processes has led companies to focus optimisation efforts across plants including refining, chemical and pulp and paper.
Plant control systems which rely on a concert of supervisory and loop-level controls to hold set points and reject distur- bances, present notorious optimi- sation challenges.
Optimisation challenges Multiphase flows, entrained solids, hybrid continuous-batch operations and other highly non- linear behaviors contribute to this complexity.
Even plants with the same process for manufacturing the same product often have differ- ent capacities and layouts and require separate optimisations to maximise production and minimise operational costs. Trial-and-error approaches to improve performance can
adversely affect plant operations and safety. Setting less aggressive controller gains as a quick fix to control system instability problems often leads to sub- optimal performance.
Dynamic simulations As an alternative to these approaches, engineers can per- form dynamic simulations of the control system (controllers and process) to gain insight into the system dynamics, understand what is causing instabilities, tune controllers, design and validate a better control architecture and achieve better plant performance. During plant design, simula- tion enables engineers to opti- mise processes, formulate the plant control system architecture and study steady-state capacity. Once in operation, plant simu- lations allow engineers to identify the root cause of ineffi- ciencies and fine-tune the process. Often, problems can be resolved by tuning isolated
control loops with a single controller. Loop tuning uses an empirical model based on process data during a predefined set point change, helping calcu- late new gain coefficients such as in PID controllers.
Modelling plant processes must be done before running control system simulations. Approaches such as data-based and first-principles each have advantages and drawbacks so engineers should understand model types and have insight into the level of model fidelity needed to solve their problem.
Process modelling
Process models can either be linear, representing a small operating region of interest and limited input range or nonlinear, representing the dynamics of a much larger range of operating conditions and input amplitudes. It can be difficult to develop an accurate model that provides enough confidence to reconfigure
a control system. Engineers must recognise not only the principles behind the models they develop but also the capabilities and limitations of their simulation software. In the race for greater process precision and speed, simulation is a cost-effective way to validate control systems, find and eliminate problems before implementation and optimise plants already in operation. Desktop simulation software, already fully capable of perform- ing such validation and optimisa- tion, continues to improve yearly as new features are added, thereby helping engineers to meet a rapidly expanding set of plant control challenges.
Tony Lennon, industrial automation marketing manager
MathWorks
www.mathworks.co.uk
l For the full story visit:
www.connectingindustry.com
Enter 242
Process & Control September Features
Filtration & Separation Mixing Equipment Drives & Controls
Transducers, Transmitters & Sensors SUPPLEMENT:
FOOD PROCESSING & PACKAGING Enter 27 36 AUGUST 2011 Process & Control
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44