This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
William H. Newkirk


Past medical expenses in a medical-malpractice case — should you introduce them?


The collateral source rule does not apply and jurors may question your actual medical damages


While recent Court of Appeals deci-


sions relating to the nature and amount of medical expense to be introduced at trial in Hanif, Howell, King, Cabrera, Olsen and Nishihama generally predominate in damage discussions in the ordinary tort claim, the statutory directives of MICRA entirely redirect the strategic focus of introducing evidence of medical expense incurred by the Plaintiff in a medical- malpractice action. Instead of the ques- tion being “what amounts of medical expenses can be introduced,” the ques- tion in a health-care negligence action


14— The Advocate Magazine JULY 2011


may be “whether or not to introduce past medical expense evidence at all.” That is so because Civil Code section


3333.1, applicable to claims against a health-care provider, abrogates the “collat- eral source rule” in a claim against a health-care provider, and statutorily gives the defendant the option of introducing evidence of the fact of certain collateral source payments of medical expenses, as well as the amounts paid by those collater- al sources specified by statute. When deciding whether to introduce


medical expenses paid by a collateral source,


practical considerations of the impact on the jury prevail. When the vast percentage of past medical expenses have been paid by insurance, juries may question the motive for the lawsuit, and may balk at a finding on liability for the plaintiff. If the plaintiff does not introduce evidence of medical expenses, the option is taken away from the defen- dant, since collateral evidence is then both irrelevant and prejudicial. By the same token, if the plaintiff does not introduce evidence of medical expenses incurred in some instances, the jury may never get an appreciation of how severe the injury is.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104