search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EXPLORING INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION


D


iversity is such a provocative word these days – one that can drive some to chain themselves to the railings of social media, and others to hide under


the duvet in despair. We have the BBC vexed about whether its presenters have a spread of regional accents, boardrooms under attack for being male dominated, and commercial advertising that clearly struggles to get its quota of minority group representation. Independent schools are not immune from this current societal obsession. You may have inferred that I find some ‘diversity’ campaigns perhaps well-meaning but rather self-regarding, when in fact it’s intrinsic to most of us in education to treat our fellow human beings without prejudice. Yet it’s a fair challenge to make to schools: how diverse are we? It’s also a challenge to make to parents when they are forming their ideas about the kind of school they are looking for. It is common for a parent to look for a school that is


filled with pupils whose parents are just like them, or, in some cases, a school that reminds them of the one they went to themselves. So some schools may be – perhaps more in their marketing portrayal than in reality – filled with children from the white, professional middle class. If that is the school a parent is looking for, I wish them


well, and there’s a good choice of such schools. But I would make the case for choosing a school that is genuinely diverse. I make this case partly because the United Kingdom has changed more than some parents realise. The Independent Schools Council’s 2016 Census provides interesting information about independent schools in the UK, including the statistic that 30 per cent of pupils in UK independent schools are now from a non- white background, a rise of 7 per cent in the past seven years. For state schools, the figures are broadly the same. London is probably leading the way, as ever; here, more than 50 per cent of pupils in independent schools are from the inappropriately named ‘minority ethnic’ category. In aggregate, the UK is increasingly ethnically diverse, although the distribution is patchy between schools and areas. It is a similar picture with socio-economic diversity, with 30 per cent of all independent-school pupils receiving some degree of fee support. The trend is away from a 25 per cent or 50 per cent scholarship for a good rugby player or whatever, and towards full means-tested support in scholarships or bursaries.


MAKING THE DIVERSITY CASE


The case for a diverse school is essentially based upon what we think the purpose of an education is. If we see education as preparing pupils not just to take exams and get into university but to thrive in the future, then the sooner our children get used to living in a diverse world, the better for them. Their future will involve working in coalitions of people across countries, in fluid teams with all kinds of backgrounds, where communication across cultures will be fundamental to success, and where insensitivity to difference could lead to failure. This isn’t about an anodyne passivity to avoid causing offence, but about genuine understanding that allows us to get the very best out of those we work with, that appreciates the existence and value of differences.


Retreating into gated communities and ethnic and


religious ghettos would not be a successful future. A boarding school where all the pupils are from white, high-income English families is no better than one where all the boarders are from Hong Kong. The alternative isn’t about reading Diversity for


Dummies, but goes deeper. Seeing the value of everybody, whether in a school or in a workplace, requires a moral underpinning, whether that comes in school from a faith position that sees all people as made in the image of God, or from a more secular focus upon the value of humanity. National differences – regardless of Brexit – are breaking down in significance. Increasing numbers of international pupils have dual passports, whether EU or UK, and a past stereotyped link between ethnic background and nationality just doesn’t work; my black pupils may be from Nigeria or London, or all kinds of passport and residence variations. I also have Nepalese pupils, ethnically Asian but UK nationals by virtue of their Gurkha fathers in the British Army. In an area that has traditionally been one of the most homogeneously white communities in the UK (now rapidly changing), I have local white and non-white day parents who have chosen the school precisely because they see the benefits of such diversity.


So among all the other criteria when considering schools, I would add this: does the school have a healthy mix of pupils (and ideally staff) across a range of national, ethnic, religious and socio-economic backgrounds? Is it ultimately a diverse school preparing pupils for a diverse world?


Keep Informed |


relocateglobal.com |


45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172