search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION: THE ROLE FOR PARLIAMENT


strengthened the law to combat organised crime and corruption, both domestically and with New Zealand firms operating overseas. Earlier in the year, New Zealand significantly improved its ranking in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Exporting Corruption review. This is largely attributable to building systems allowing greater evidence of detection, investigation and enforcement of anti- corruption measures by our Serious Fraud Office and the New Zealand Police.


It is fair to say we have been very active in recent years in addressing the full gamut of financial corruption issues. Legislation passed by parliaments does much to set the framework for eliminating corruption, especially the laws governing our public sector agencies. The way we, as Parliamentarians, make


these laws to maintain the transparency, probity and accountability in the public sector is a key determinant in our countries’ successes, or failures, at combating corruption.


A trusted public sector According to successive Transparency International indices over the past two decades, New Zealand has long boasted one of the world’s most politically neutral, publically trusted and incorrupt public services. The bases of this strong track record are legislative, and over a century old. But this has not happened by accident – rather, through generations of progressive legislative reform and consistent politically-driven change. Throughout the 1890s, our longest-serving premier Richard Seddon shamelessly awarded public sector positions to supporters, even making illiterate men ‘temporary


clerks’. In 1912, William Massey’s conservative Reform Government, which had just been elected to office, lived up to its name and introduced the Public Service Act as one of its very first reforms. This law ended political patronage in public sector appointments, introduced promotion based on merit, brought greater accountability for the efficient use of public money, strictly separated administrative and political functions and appointed an independent Public Service Commissioner.


Over the decades since there have been further advances. In 1982, Sir Robert Muldoon’s National Government – not otherwise known for its liberalism – introduced the Official Information Act. This predates the equivalent UK legislation – the Freedom of Information Act 2000 - by eighteen years and achieves similar outcomes. To be fair to


Above: The Parliament building in Wellington, New Zealand.


our Australian cousins, their freedom of information regime was introduced in the same year as ours.


The net effect of this ongoing legislative change has been movement towards a state which spends taxpayers’ money more efficiently; is staffed by upstanding citizens who have the public good at heart; officials who behave more as the neutral servants of the government of the day; government which is more transparent in the way it acts (within the constraints imposed by the need for personal privacy, commercial confidentiality and national security); and is largely free of corrupt practices. It is therefore more trusted by the public it serves.


The Parliamentarian | 2016: Issue One | 61


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92