search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
7TH COMMONWEALTH YOUTH PARLIAMENT


hearings was very beneficial in providing real life witness examination experience for the scrutiny committee process relating to a Bill for debate. During the afternoon of day two, both the youth government and youth opposition debated motions and a former Speaker of the Legislative Assembly took the Chair to provide guidance during these sessions. The Speaker from 2005 to 2012, Hon. Jane Aagaard gave the youth parliamentarians the benefit of her experience and yet another perspective for youth parliamentarians to interact with an experienced former parliamentarian.


One of the great experiences of a Youth Parliament is the nuance and discovery that comes with each new jurisdiction hosting the event.


The participation of mentors and advisers such as a former Northern Territory Assembly Speaker, serving Members of the Northern Territory Assembly, the Clerk and senior officers of the Assembly and our team of valued mentors meant we had a rich variety of divergent experience coming from the same Westminster foundations. Mr Gavin Shuker MP from the House of Commons; Mr Drew Smith MSP from the Parliament of Scotland; Hon Akierra Missick, Deputy Premier of Turks and Caicos; Mr Gareth Ward MP from the New South Wales Legislative Assembly; Hon. Don Harwin MLA, President of the New South Wales Legislative Council;


Ms Rebecca White MP from the Tasmanian House of Assembly; Ms Lauren Moss MLA, a Member of the Northern Territory Legislative Assembly; and Ms Susan Sourial, Committee Clerk of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia were all in attendance working hard day and night.


They collaborated with and guided the youth


parliamentarians and coached them on procedure and tactical matters over the life of CYP7 and their efforts were much appreciated by all.


Their invaluable contributions brought to the experience a range of differing backgrounds leading to lots of healthy and engaging debate and questioning for many participants about how and why things within Westminster settings are done in similar, but also in different ways. Many of the youth


parliamentarians also brought divergent local experiences from their home jurisdictions and enthusiastically compared, questioned and considered the procedures at play as we used the then existing Northern Territory Assembly Standing Orders as the basis for our CYP7 procedure.


This enthusiasm lead to some amusing moments where Youth Parliamentarians cited infrequently used Standing Orders which were not upheld by the Chair by virtue of local practice and convention where these have been liberally interpreted and read down over


many years.


This was another valuable experience where learning how convention and day to day practice and procedures develop and influence the way that parliament works in each jurisdiction came to the fore. The second evening of events included an official welcome function at Government House overlooking Darwin Harbour where the Youth Chief Minister thanked His Honour the Administrator of the Northern Territory on behalf of the youth parliamentarians for his hospitality.


Day Three - A Change of Government


By day three the youth parliamentarians were ready to debate the Charter of Human Rights Bill, but before that occurred, a majority of the youth parliamentarians sought an unscheduled special morning sitting to consider a motion of no confidence in the government. I started out above saying that there were many ‘firsts’ at CYP7, and apart from being in touch with local crocodiles, another first was that a CYP government was defeated on the floor of the House.


As the result of the prior self-nominating process, the Conservatives had the most members of a single party but were in minority government with independent members holding the balance of power.


It was reported that overnight on Tuesday evening some old fashioned political horse-trading took place amongst some of the youth parliamentarians and in the spirit of political manoeuvring inherent in Westminster style parliaments, particularly in Australia in recent years, the dynamic on Wednesday morning had changed.


The Northern Territory Assembly’s Clerk assumed the Chair as Acting Speaker and


54 | The Parliamentarian | 2016: Issue One


presided over a sometimes emotional debate which resulted in the defeat of the Conservative Government on a motion of no confidence and the formation of a new government. The result lead to a walkout by the now new opposition members. In the normal course of events, the Assembly in the Northern Territory would be in hiatus in a ‘no confidence period’ where either party or any grouping could seek to form a government on the floor for a period of eight days before the Administrator would consider the option of calling an election, however given the nature of the timeframe for CYP7, it was accepted that the numbers had changed and the government had as well.


My Clerk and his officers have received some interesting feedback concerning this aspect of the proceedings with some delegates expressing disappointment that ‘politics’ got in the way of being parliamentarians.


I take the view however, that this display of tactics are a part of the learning experience of being a parliamentarian and that disappointment is inherent to parliamentary practice. The Westminster experience is characterised by members acting in a political manner and in fact, this was a very valuable experience for the CYP7 participants all round. The Clerk briefed me on these matters before the afternoon when it was my turn to assume the Chair as Speaker of the Youth Parliament. I was a little fearful that the morning’s acrimony and disappointment might manifest itself in the afternoon proceedings but to the credit of all youth parliamentarians they proceeded with a mature and intelligent debate and I was delighted at the level of order and good procedural practice I witnessed


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92