FAA Updated Guidance

Almost Lost in Translation By Randy Rowles

Beginning last year, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) released several training-related guidance updates. These releases included advisory circulars, a national policy notice, and most recently, the Flight Instructor Helicopter Practical Test Standards (PTS). In several of my previous training articles, I referred to subject matter affected by the release of this new guidance. I would now like to review a few of the specific documents released by the FAA and provide an overview of how changes may affect you.

The first and most encompassing change was the release of “FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 61.65F.” This AC provides a comprehensive overview of the majority of endorsements required in accordance with “FAR Part 61–Certification of Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground Instructors.” The FAA added several key endorsements to include “Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) 73: Robinson R-22/R-44 Special Training and Experience Requirements.” Additionally, endorsements related to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), night vision goggles, and the most elusive endorsement of all…the practical test (FAR 61.39)! The intent of this AC is to provide a standardized endorsement that satisfied the FAA legal types, and thus is befitting for use by our industry flight instructor cadre.

The AC is a great guide, but shouldn’t be utilized with blind faith. Before you endorse any student’s logbook using AC guidance, verify the regulation being endorsed is correct. In many cases, the endorsement within the AC may in fact be reflective of a different

category or class of aircraft, or the incorrect regulation altogether. You wouldn’t want to incorrectly endorse a helicopter student for solo and find you actually endorsed them to fly a balloon. (It could happen.)

Another document released in August 2015 was “National Policy 8900.320N.” This document provided the guidance to be used for the issuance of the NVG instructor endorsement required under FAR 61.195(k)(7). Additionally, the guidance provided clarity on who is authorized to provide this endorsement. It is important for anyone having received an NVG instructor endorsement prior to August 22, 2015, to be aware that their previous endorsement

is no longer valid. In this case, the NVG instructor would need to receive an updated endorsement from an authorized person.

Per the guidance, an authorized person would either be: (1) a Designated Pilot Examiner (DPE), or (2) a Part 141 chief instructor holding a Letter of Authorization (LOA) for such purpose. It is important to note that a Part 141 chief instructor is limited to endorsing only those students that graduate from the pilot school’s approved NVG instructor course.

On March 22, 2016, the FAA released the updated “Flight Instructor Practical Test Standards for Rotorcraft.” The primary change—or

intent of the change—was the addition of endorsement in lieu of practical test for the power-off landing (touchdown) during either

the straight-in or 180-degree autorotation. The change was in response to many years of FAA and industry challenges to identify qualified checking personnel (FAA inspectors and examiners) proficient to conduct this maneuver during a flight instructor practical test. The effort of altering only a single element of the task, the touchdown autorotation, would seem simple.

The updated PTS states (bold emphasis added):

Instructional knowledge must be demonstrated on the practical test in autorotations, either straight-in or 180°, as per Area of Operation X for a helicopter class rating. An examiner may accept, at his or her discretion, a logbook endorsement in lieu of demonstrating these tasks during the practical test.

It would appear that the maneuvers identified within Area of Operation X would be at the discretion of the examiner. In fact,

the intent was only for the touchdown portion of the maneuver to be endorsed in lieu of the practical test. We as an industry must not allow a simple textual error to alter the safety of our industry.

The FAA is currently working to clarify this issue. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to email me at

Randy Rowles has been an FAA pilot examiner for 20 years for all helicopter certificates and ratings. He holds an FAA Gold Seal Flight Instructor Certificate, NAFI Master Flight Instructor designation, and was the 2013 recipient of the HAI Flight Instructor of the Year Award. Rowles is currently director of training at Epic Helicopters in Fort Worth, Texas.

90 May/June 2016

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94