search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
technology | LFTs


Right: StarRov products from Johns Manville provide weight savings of up to 66% in LFT applications such as


automotive underbody shields and truck battery boxes


LFTs for piping. “If that application takes off, we could see a significant bump in the growth curve,” he says. Most recent introductions from Johns Manville are


its StarRov 485 roving for LFT PP and StarRov 890 for polyamides. The company says StarRov 485 rovings are easy to unwind and generate little fuzz. Wettability is said to be “excellent.” Benefits cited for StarRov 890 include “excellent opening of the bundle, very fast impregnation and perfect wet-out in various types of PA and PPA, high dry strength and low fuzz.”


for commercialisation in 2017. Comparing requirements in glass for short and long


reinforcements, Melvin notes that the sizing is normally quite different. “When you are producing short fibre reinforced compounds, you don’t have to worry about how the fibre pays out from the package. If you use fibres in LFT production with the same sizing, the strands will stick to each other so much, filaments will break. So the sizing needs to be formulated according to the different processing needs. With LFTs, you need the package to pay out without the filaments breaking. And then you want the rovings to open up quickly when they enter the process, so they get fully wetted.” Melvin says that while polyamides form the matrix of


at least 80% of all short fibre reinforced compounds, the LFT market is very different, with polypropylene taking the lion’s share by a similar margin. “With the pursuit of higher performance applications in high-temperature environments, polyamide-based LFTs may well grow faster than PP types, but they will never have the same market share.” However, Melvin says that at the recent JEC compos-


ites show in Paris, most of his discussions on LFTs related to polyamide types. The trend is being driven by German automobile OEMs, he says. “Europe is leading the charge right now, and the rest of the world will follow.” He also sees potential for polyethylene-based


40 COMPOUNDING WORLD | May 2016


The end for Twintex One particularly interesting technology that could have been a serious contender in the LFT business appears to have fallen by the wayside. Twintex, originally developed by glass maker Vetrotex, was a commingled glass/polypropylene that was produced on modified glass fibre plants. Vetrotex developed a way to commin- gle PP fibres (and later PET fibres) with the glass fibres as the fibres were actually being produced. This was said to enable production of composites with the highest interfacial properties possible. Twintex could be processed on its own, or let down into unreinforced polymers, since grades could be produced with very high glass contents. The product was also suitable for conversion into fabrics that could then be processed rather like glass mat reinforced thermoplastics, GMTs. Twintex later became the property of Owens Corning,


which first licensed the technology to Fiber Glass Indus- tries (FGI) and then sold it to the same company in 2012. FGI ceased trading in 2014.


Click on the links for more information: ❙ www.PlastiComp.comwww.sabic.comwww.sumitomo-chem.co.jpwww.jnc-corp.co.jp (Chisso) ❙ www.solvay.comwww.borealisgroup.comwww.ivw.uni-kl.dewww.easicomp.dewww.polyone.comwww.akro-plastic.comwww.coperion.comwww.sp-protec.comwww.ict.fraunhofer.dewww.leistritz.comwww.dieffenbacher.dewww.sinoalloy.comwww.comacplast.comwww.ppg.comhttps://w.owenscorning.comwww.jm.com


www.compoundingworld.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94