search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE


Figure 1: Influence of extruder screw speed on volume resistivity at 0.1 and 0.2wt% TUBALL loadings


good dispersion required to form the necessary SWCNT network in the polymer a critical shear stress must be achieved during compounding that overcomes the physical entanglement and cohesive forces between the carbon nanotubes. It was observed that a very low


concentration of carbon nanotubes does not modify the electrical conductivity of the polymer considerably. However, as the dosage increases and the percolation threshold is reached, the electrical conductivity increases over a very narrow concentration range. For the polymer system in this study this transition was observed in a concentration range significantly lower (0.1% - 0.2% SWCNT) than for standard conductive fillers (as shown in the chart on the previous page). These experiments were performed


over a screw speed range of between 250rpm and 750rpm. For this highly fluid MFI 25 polymer system it was clear that better results were obtained at higher screw speeds (Figure 1). However, it is known from previous studies that too high a shear level can lead to degradation of CNT integrity. As shear is influenced by both the processing parameters and polymer viscosity, some level of polymer system-specific optimization will be required to achieve good dispersion and distribution of SWCNTs without destroy- ing their characteristics. Twin screw extruders offer the capability to design specific optimized screw profiles. One experiment compared a distributive screw profile to a dispersive


Figure 2: Influence of process temperature on volume resistivity at 0.1 and 0.2wt% TUBALL loadings


profile during the masterbatching step. The higher shear achieved by the dispersive screw allowed a resistivity of 6.20E+03 ohm*cm to be reached for the compound after dilution at 0.2wt% SWC- NT loading while the material produced using the lower shear distributive screw was measured at 6,00E+04 ohm*cm. The study investigated two different


feeding options for TUBALL incorporation during the masterbatching step. The resistivity values were found to be lower when the SWCNTs were introduced with the polymer pellets through the main hopper (6.40E+03 ohm*cm at 0.2%SWC- NT) than when they were added sepa- rately through a side feeder (2.80E+05 ohm*cm at same dosage). It was also seen that increased


processing temperature during the masterbatching and dilution step resulted in a reduction of resistivity in the compound (Figure 2). Higher processing temperatures would be expected to reduce the applied shear during mixing but this effect is thought to be counter- balanced by reduced Van der Waals interaction between the entangled CNTs.


Conclusions This experimental work has demonstrated that melt mixing using standard twin screw compounding equipment allows preparation of conductive polypropylene compounds at very low dosages of TUBALL through a two-step process involving the preparation of a masterbatch. Selection of process conditions was


Table 1: Volume resistivity of PP masterbatches containing 2wt% TUBALL SWCNTs prepared under different process conditions


Screw speed Low Low High High


CNT/IL Feeding Side Feeder Main hopper Side Feeder Main hopper


Volume resistivity (Ohm*cm) 6.3E+01 1.0E+02 1.3E+01 3.7E+01


found to significantly affect the final performance of the compound. For the selected formulations, it was observed that compounding conditions generating higher levels of shear and using higher process temperatures provided the highest conductivities. It was concluded that increased shear helps the dispersion and distribution of the SWCNT, creating a conductive network at significantly lower dosage levels than standard conductive additives. As this study was carried out at lab scale, it is expected that optimization of formulations and process conditions for industrial scale production would allow a further reduction in the amount of SWCNT required to achieve a specific conductivity. While this preliminary investigation


was limited to polypropylene, OCSiAl has observed similar trends in polyethylene compounds and believes this study sets a baseline for development in a broader range of thermoplastics including engineering resins.


About OCSiAl OCSiAl is the first company to develop breakthrough technology for single-wall carbon nanotube production, enabling large-scale commercial use. In 2014, OCSiAl entered the nanomaterials market with the universal additive TUBALL, which contains >75% SWCNTs. OCSiAl is developing technologies based on SWCNT for a range of applications including lithium-ion batteries, elasto- mers, transparent conductive films, composite materials and others. It has regional offices in the USA, Luxembourg, Russia, Korea, China, Hong Kong and India.


For more information visit www.ocsial.com or contact Dr. Christian Maus, OCSiAl Development and Support Leader, christian.maus@ocsial.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94