search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
10 INDUSTRY NEWS


Supply chain is under-resourced and fragmented, say experts


Jack Wooler reports


A Round Table discussion was held recently at London’s Sky Garden (pictured, below), asking a range of experts from across the sector the question, “Is the supply chain fit for purpose?” The panel at the event, hosted by Jablite,


discussed the key aspects of the supply chain that need attention, as well as how it can help deliver the Government’s ambitious new homes targets, and how innovation may suffer in this rush to build. Greg Hill, deputy MD of housebuilder


Hill, saw “two fundamental challenges” as most pressing to the industry. The first, widely agreed across the panel, was “a lack of resource,” and second, the “extremely fragmented” nature of the supply chain. The problem of capacity dominated the


conversation, with the rising skills crisis being echoed by several panel members as a critical issue. Fear of uncertainty caused by Brexit was also prevalent, with the possi- ble loss of EU workers exacerbating the already dire skills climate. The “impact of tariffs” following Brexit


was a concern raised by Peter Andrew, deputy chair of HBF. He referred to materi- als such as timber, which can’t be grown in England to the same extent it’s imported, and said that possible trade tariffs with the EU are bound to “cause issues.” There was agreement that adding any more uncer- tainty to the process would inevitably slow the sector down. It was generally accepted that schools do


not promote the industry enough. Even though there are a huge range of well-paid positions in the sector, it’s not glamourised in the same way in which a lawyer is, for example. David Jervis of Spitfire Homes agreed, adding that “we’ve got to attract the youngsters,” referring to the industry’s crisis of image. Prejudices involving construction were


also accepted as a part of this, with a lack of diversity in both gender and ethnicity. To prove this point Geoff Pearce, executive director of Swan Housing Association pointed to the room, which included relatively few women and a vast majority of “white men in suits.” With the growing crisis in skills and the shortage of housing, he said “it’s clearly unsustainable to ignore 50 per cent of the population.” Bringing the conversation back to the


supply chain, chair Rupert Bates (of Showhouse magazine) asked the panel, “Do you think by using the term supply


WWW. HBDONLINE.CO.UK


chain we’re implying a subservience to housebuilders?” Rebecca Larkin, senior economist at the Construction Products Association commented, “We’re a cyclical industry, so it works both ways.” It was made clear that more could be done to improve the relationship and efficiencies between housebuilders and the supply chain. “We could certainly work a lot closer together,” added Peter Andrew. Innovative companies were involving the


supply chain much earlier on in the house- building process, panel members agreed, and it was also suggested that the supply chain should be more widely involved in the planning process. Imperative to all this however, it was


argued, is a stable economic background from which to work. The panel agreed that a huge amount of reassurance is needed in the industry, with major investments made three to five years in advance of actual builds. Rebecca Larkin referred to the industry’s need for “greater flexibility to deal with economic challenges,” with all members of the board recognising the toll the 2008 crash took on the industry. A member of the audience later spoke


up, claiming that buildings in Britain are boring, and that we could do much more offsite. The range of UK housebuilding is something akin to “50 shades of beige,” he quipped. Andrew Burgess, group land and planning director at Churchill Retirement Living heartily disagreed with this, saying housebuilders “build for the customer and to context,” he replied, providing whatever the buyers ask for, and ensuring that their developments don’t look out of place in their surroundings. Offsite construction however was, overall,


accepted as the most promising innovation in construction, but was not agreed as the sole solution to fix the industry. Geoff


Pearce of Swan Housing, who are investing in their own modular housing factory, said that “necessity is the mother of invention.” He believed that all big housebuilders, “whether they’ve realised it or not,” are looking at offsite construction schemes and its future within the industry. Offsite is still an emerging force, and


some housebuilders are unwilling to risk investing in such small companies. It was argued that the off site sector needs to be grown sustainably, and should perhaps be adopted first by SMEs and those who can build their own facilities. Large scale developments are often sold


in waves, allowing time for excitement to be built and sales to be made while constructing each phase. This of course prevents empty homes stagnating. The ‘instant’ nature of off site builds however would work against many housebuilders’ sales strategies, but would perhaps benefit HAs, who would have more to gain from speedy builds and move-ins. Financing of SMEs was another key


topic covered by the panel. Peter Andrew of HBF noted: “there is a lot of money around, but it’s just not finding its way to SMEs.” The question was aired of small builders’ equities could be stretched to more than a few projects? There was litter clarity on how to achieve this, but Andrew was certain that “we need more players on the pitch.” While many suggestions were aired at


the event, two messages were clear. Firstly, there’s no catch-all answer to fixing the housing crisis, and also, the relationship between supply chain and builders needs to improve.


MORE COULD BE DONE TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCIES AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOUSEBUILDERS AND THE SUPPLY CHAIN


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60