This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Summer Sports - Tennis


Agripower Contractors


Court testing in full swing


able to bake the surface without the need for additional weight. That said, there have been years where we’ve needed to ballast up something bigger, because weather and, therefore, time has been against us, and we’ve needed to pull more moisture out of the surface quicker then we’d like in an ideal world. This though, is where we think testing equipment does have its place. We’re not suggesting that Clegg hammers, or moisture probes, should ever replace the experience, touch and feel of a well-qualified grounds professional. However, these tools can be used to confirm what we often suspect, and refine and fine tune our decision making. The other advantage for us, is that we can seek some level of consistency and uniformity in what we are doing, not just from one court to another on site, but even from one venue to another. As a pre-Wimbledon event, we try and produce courts which match their playing characteristics. By knowing what they aim for on a Clegg hammer reading, we can aim for a similar court hardness and, therefore, speed and bounce. The Clegg hammer and moisture meter, for our venue in particular, are invaluable pieces of equipment and detect variations with far greater accuracy then we could by touch and feel. In some ways, this is where the level of play for which you are preparing your surface may decide whether these implements are worthwhile or not, as the variations in moisture for us may only affect the bounce of a ball on a forehand by, say 5-10cm. To the average club player, probably not a noticeable amount, but to players from the world’s top ten, that is a huge margin.


As a result, we test the courts morning and night during the playing season, on at least fifteen pre-determined points on each court, so that we can monitor consistency, and address as necessary. For example, if an area has become too hard compared to the rest of the courts on the Clegg Hammer, we can confirm the problem is that it is too dry by checking the moisture probe readings for that area, and then apply additional local irrigation to address the problem. This is where the tools are invaluable to us. Anyone familiar with our site and our construction will know the issues we face with


inconsistency. Our three practice courts are constructed on native soil and, so, are significantly affected by the water table. Our block of four match courts and centre court were recently reconstructed (2012/13), but not in a way that we would have wanted, had we been working at the club at the time! We have subsoil where there should be topsoil, road stone and gravel all over the place, and even the depths of each vary across individual courts, never mind from one to another!


On a perfect construction, the only allowance you would likely need to make when drying down would be for shading at the south end, however, for us, our courts don’t dry consistently because of the issues


underneath the grass. Being able to test the surface hardness and moisture levels on a very local level allows us to make adaptations to our maintenance that, from feel alone, we’d struggle to refine to the level required. Now, there is no arguing that this isn’t currently working for us. The courts have been acknowledged as being


PC APRIL/MAY 2016 I 87


Sports Turf Specialists


Sports turf construction and renovation, drainage & irrigation, hard & soft landscaping, 


Tel: 01494 866776 info@agripower.co.uk www.agripower.co.uk


50 Years of Good Grounding


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148