downsmail.co.uk
Where now for transport plan? MailMarks
MAIDSTONE Council may now bemak-
ing steady progress allocating sites for more than 18,000 homes likely to be required by Government by 2031, but the vital linked transportation infrastructure planning looks to be in tatters. For many years the council has placed its
faith in the future of park and ride in the evolving local plan. But now it has suc- cumbed to resident pressure to abandon the Linton Crossroads proposal and, even more significantly, is losing the key Sittingbourne Road site because of heavy costs – mostly in- creased rent. This will leave us with just two park and
ride sites – instead of the expected four – with nothing in the very busy north and south of the town. The council talks of a drop-off in use of the Sittingbourne Road site, but when I drove around it a few weeks ago it was very busy, with just a few spare places around the fringes. Do not underestimate the impact of this loss.
Sittingbourne Road can be a nightmare for congestion at peak times. What now? We all know congestion to the south is very serious and getting worse. I was notified of a parcel for collection from Royal Mail at Park Wood and twice abandoned the unenviable
Statement too lile, too late
Dear Sir – It remains to be seen whether the statement from KCC about planning applications in the south of the borough, as reported in the October edition of the Downs Mail, will stand up to scrutiny. There is such a clamour for large-scale
developments and a ready supply of landowners willing to sell land in order to meet the demand for new houses. Cynics would say it is a classic case of closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. Those of us who regularly use the A229 or the A274 in and out of Maidstone are all too familiar with the congestion that already exists on the approaches to the Wheatsheaf junction. The smallest of infractions can impact
on traffic flows, turning a 10-minute journey into a one-hour epic. And all this before the new developments at Langley and other locations come on stream. We see first-hand every day the consequences of already intolerable traffic conditions – lengthy queues, constant red light-jumping at the Wheatsheaf, inappropriate overtaking to get ahead by one car’s length, cutting in and cutting up and other dubious manoeuvres to gain an advantage. This is all only going to get a lot worse,
and there is little prospect of any improvement. The planning process does not convince me and the notion of localism is simply a pipe dream. Provided
Contact our team ...
Stephen Eighteen Editor
stephen@downsmail.co.uk 01622 734735 ext 231
30 Maidstone South December 2015 Diane Nicholls
Assistant editor
diane@downsmail.co.uk 01622 734735 ext 232
Jane Shotliff
Journalist
jane@downsmail.co.uk 01622 734735 ext 233
Dawn Kingsford
Journalist
dawn@downsmail.co.uk 01622 734735 ext 233
that a planning application does not hit a policy or technical hitch, permission will be granted. An application for 100-plus houses was recently agreed for Heath Road at Coxheath, the documents submitted to the planning committee included, amongst others, a photograph of Heath Road. I leave it to readers to decide which one of the two above was submitted and I hope you will forgive my cynicism concerning the KCC statement. Mike Kenny, by email
Parking at park a done deal
Dear Sir –A documentwas placed in my mail box thisweek entitled "Consultation on a proposal to introduce car park charges in Mote Park". After reading, it was clear that this is not a consultation document or a proposal. The document is a missive stating what Maidstone Council has already decided what will happen regarding parking in Mote Park, what the parking fees will be, the times they will apply and when they will come into operation, without council
DENNISFOWLE President
dfowle2011@aol.com
task (why did Royal Mail move from the town centre and create problems for so many cus- tomers?). I rarely find short-term parking a problem
in Maidstone – it’s expensive but usually available and at times difficult to reach, due to congestion. It is longer-term parking for the local work
force and commuterswhich increasingly con- cerns me. Too many business car parks in the town centre now disappear as planning per- missions are granted for developments oblit- erating the parks. I see demand growing as employees seek economical parking agreements at The Mote cricket ground. The council has always seen improved in- frastructure as the key partner to increased residential and business expansion in the local plan, but now I can only see a nightmare transport scenario. There seems little hope of KCC or anyone else funding a south-east Maidstone strategic
route – the old Leeds/Langley bypass (if only former KCC leader the late Sir Sandy Bruce- Lockhart had agreed one more year in office he would have fulfilled his pledge). The changes in the town centre bridge gy-
ratory are welcome, but I have little confi- dence of improvement in traffic flows. I worry that as Maidstone grows and in- creasingly grinds to a fume-filled halt, the council will aim to bar most cars from the town centre. This will have massive detri- mental implications for residents and busi- nesses. One way or another we have cause to be very concerned.
Badger-ed MAIDSTONE’S badger population
seems to be growing and I do not welcome them hunting a home in our garden. There was a time when they charmed me
from a distance. But their closeness now far from enchants me. They have demolished shrubs to attack bird nests and their young. They have dug wide and deep holes in the lawn and garden to clean out bees nests. Now they are digging to find a home. I am
very dedicated to deterring them and even plan a courtesy light for these shy, nocturnal creatures. All tipswelcome.
tax payer consultation in any form whatsoever. I believe Maidstone Council is again looking to use the motorist as a cash cow, using every excuse in the book to try to justify the charge. Needless to say, I amagainst parking
fees of any kind in Mote Park. The park is there for the enjoyment of all townspeople, paid for in their council tax. Regarding town centre parking and the
park and ride, Maidstone town centre shops and restaurants are always complaining about loss of business to out- of-town malls. May I suggest that Maidstone Council seriously investigates scrapping parking fees in the town and park and ride fees. This will then offer shoppers what the out-of-town malls offer their customers. It could be tried for a period of say, one
year, and if successful, extended. I amof the belief that the additional shoppers it would aract would more than compensate for the loss of fees. Maidstone Council would aract more business rates and the empty shops in the town centre would disappear – a win-win situation. Michael Lilewood, by email
We will ensure your views are taken into account in our consideration of the introduction of parking charges for Mote Park – both in your view of the process that we are undertaking and the principle of charging. Response from Alison Broom, chief executive of Maidstone Council
Comment
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40