Inheritance determinations where there is no estate plan in place: The new ruling now brings those couples and their individual families within the California Probate Code dealing with intestate succession, so that if no estate planning documents were in place when a spouse died, the code would provide some protection for the surviving same-sex spouse. Even though these benefits are now extended to same-sex couples, the vast majority of married couples, whether same-sex couples or not, will benefit from proper estate plan- ning that will help to prevent a long and costly pro- bate process. Keep in mind that I am not advocating the use of the intestate succession statute for estate planning.
Income tax issues: Joint Returns: Filing of a joint (marital) tax return
may produce a lower combined tax than filing two single tax returns, which same-sex couples were often forced to do in the past. Filing amended returns for prior years may also be an option, which could produce a refund due to the lower combined tax bill for those years.
IRA and Other Retirement Accounts: A legally married spouse has the right to be the
sole and primary beneficiary of an IRA or other retire- ment account. It is important to revisit beneficiary designations to assure compliance with this rule. Additionally, the same-sex spouse survivor can now “roll” the qualified plan of the deceased spouse to their own plan, allowing tax deferral for the surviving spouse’s retirement if the beneficiary designations are properly shown on the account.
Social Security: Same-sex couples should report their spouses to
social security to preserve all the benefits that would vest in a surviving spouse.
Long-Term Care Planning: Veterans Benefits: Military veterans have a little-
known pension that can supplement home care, assisted living and board and care. If there is a recog- nized spouse, the benefit is often greater than if the claimant is an unmarried person. Other benefits for surviving spouses are now available for all spouses, no matter their orientation. Medi-Cal Planning: Long-term care can be financially devastating for heterosexual couples and prior to Windsor and Obergefell, it was even
more devastating for same-sex couples. Many of the techniques that I have used in California to protect a couple’s estate and allow them to access Medi-Cal were not available to same-sex couples. For example, if a person was institutionalized in a nursing home, a heterosexual spouse is entitled to retain over $119,000 of non-exempt assets (for 2015) and thus a good portion of the estate, was then able to be preserved in the case of heterosexual couples. This benefit was long denied to same-sex couples and the institutionalized spouse was required to have only $2000 in non-exempt resources. Additionally, states are mandated to “recover” their benefits back to the extent of the estate after both the husband and wife had died, which placed the surviving same-sex spouse in a difficult position, as recovery would commence even though the same- sex partner was still living. This left same-sex couples without the protection of the stay on recovery until the death of the second spouse. This rule is now avail- able to all couples in California.
Real Estate Considerations: Community Property: Same-sex couples should
revisit ownership and titling of any jointly-held real estate property. In California, changing the vesting of real estate to “community property” can offer numer- ous tax benefits that are otherwise unavailable, if not expressly stated as such on the couple’s real estate deed. Reassessment: Upon the death of a spouse in a
SSM in which the real estate transfers to the surviving spouse, the property will no longer be reassessed due to a “change in ownership.” Carrying this prin-
ciple further, transfers between SSM couples to their children and/or the other spouse’s children, can now occur without reassessment, under the benefits provided by parent-child reassessment exclusion provisions under California law. Tax Basis Issues: If same-sex couples take advan-
tage of converting the titles on their real estate to “community property” as we mentioned above, they can receive the benefit of a “step-up” in the tax basis of the property upon the death of the first SSM spouse. This means that upon the first spouse’s passing, the valuation (for tax purposes, also called the “tax basis”) will be reset to the market value upon the date of death. This is extremely valuable for real estate that has appreciated or increased in value. The practical effect of this is that all of the capital gains that were inherent in the property are wiped out up to the market value that existed on the date of death of the first SSM spouse. In the past, married couples have seen hundreds of thousands of dollars saved with this basis adjustment, upon sale of homes after the first spouse has passed away. From an estate planning perspective, now that
marital equality is a nationwide right, same-sex couples can and should be sure to take advantage of the estate planning techniques that were previously only available to heterosexual married couples.
Stuart Furman, Esq. is an elder law attorney and Of Counsel to Zeldes, Haeggquist & Eck, LLP, a San Diego law firm. He is the author ofThe ElderCare Ready Book andThe ElderCare Ready Pack available on
amazon.com. Interested in a consultation? Contact Zeldes, Haeggquist & Eck at 619.342.8000 or go to
zhlaw.com.
NOVEMBER 2015 | RAGE monthly 39
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64