This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
e-learning resources, active promotion is required to raise awareness of this fantastic resource, to maximise use and facilitate improved patient care.


Conclusion The Image Interpretation project is a substantial resource for practitioners, offering flexible learning in key areas of image interpretation. Improved interpretation skills will contribute to streamlined patient pathways, efficient use of resources and assist in the delivery of a patient focused NHS. e-Learning for Healthcare's award winning pedigree, coupled with content produced over many hundreds of hours by nationally and internationally renowned practitioners and academics, validate the high quality learning available, and the project should act as a barometer by which other programs are judged.


References 1. Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology UK Workforce Report 2011. London: RCR, 2012.


2. Cancer , Cardiovascular London: DH, 2011


3. Royal College of Radiologists. Ultrasound T RCR, 2005.


4. 5.


McKiernan S, Chiarelli P anaesthesiology


raining Recommendations for Medical and Surgical Specialties. London: , Warren-Forward H. Diagnostic ultrasound use in physiotherapy . Radiography 2010;16(2):154-59.


Griffiths M, Dawson G. Hybrid imaging in nuclear medicine: Creating a patient-centric approach to service delivery Imaging & Oncology 2014:36-45.


6. Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation T 7. Royal College of Radiologists, Society & College of Radiographers. T


SCoR, 2012. 8. Appleby J, Galea A, Murr ay R. The NHS productivity challenge Experience from the front line. London: The King's F und, 2014.


9. Royal College of General Practitioners, Society & College of Radiographers, Royal College of Radiologists. Quality imaging services for primary care: a good practice guide. London: RCR, 2013.


10. National Imaging Clinical Advisory Group. Implementing 7 Day working in Imaging Departments: Good Practice Guidance.UK: Department of Health, 2011.


11. College of Radiographers. Preliminary Clinical Evaluation and Clinical Reporting by Radiographers: Policy and Practice Guidance. London: CoR, 2013.


12. Berman L, de Lacey G, T womey E, et al. Reducing errors in the accident department: a simple method using radiographers. Br Med J 1985;290(6466):421-2.


13. Brealey S, Scally A, Hahn S, et al. Accuracy of radiographers red dot or triage of accident and emergency radiographs in clinical practice: a systematic review


. Clin Radiol 2006;61(7):604-15.


14. Society & College of Radiographers. Scope of radiographic practice survey 2012. London: SCoR, 2012. 15. Smith TN, T


raise P rural radiographers. Rural Remote Health 2009;9(2):1145. 16. Neep M, Steffens T , Owen R, et al. A survey of radiographers' confidence and self-perceived accuracy in frontline image interpretation and their continuing educational preferences. J Med Radiat Sci 2014;61(2):69-77.


17. Coleman L, Piper K. Radiographic interpretation of the appendicular skeleton: A comparison between casualty officers, nurse practitioners and radiographers. Radiography 2009;15(3):196-202.


-41-


Dorothy Keane is based at City Hospitals, Sunderland and works part-time for the Society and College of Radiographers.


, Cook A. The influence of a continuing education program on the image interpretation accuracy of rust Public Inquiry Executive Summary eam working in clinical imaging. London: RCR, . . London, 2013. , emergency medicine, and , End of Life Care Dermatology Programme. Cancer Waiting Times – A Guide (V ersion 8.0).


18. Price R. Ultrasound: From pioneering to the present. Radiography 2010;16(2):91-92.


19. Price RC, Le Masurier SB. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography: A new perspective. Radiography 2007;13(1):18-29.


20. Lockwood P , Piper K, Pittock L. CT head reporting by radiographers: Results of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography 2014. In press.


21. Sumkin JH, Klaman HM, Graham M, et al. Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(1):253-6.


22. T anaka R, T akamori M, Uchiyama Y readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography


, et al. Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' . Brit J Radiol 2015;88(1047):20140565.


23. Piper K, Buscall KL, Thomas N. MRI reporting by radiographers: Findings of an accredited postgraduate programme. Radiography 2010;16(2):136-42.


24. Brealey S, Piper K, King D, et al. Observer agreement in the reporting of knee and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations: Selectively trained MR radiographers and consultant radiologists compared with an index radiologist. Eur J Radiol 2013;82(10):e597-605.


25. Zafar S, Safdar S, Zafar AN. Evaluation of use of e-Learning in undergraduate radiology education: A review Radiol 2014;83(12):2277-87.


26. e-Learning Awards. Secondary e-Learning Awards 2014. Details available at http://www Content/e-learning-awards-2014-winners/51/ (last accessed March 2015).


27. Local Safeguarding Children Board Haringey . London: CoR, 2006. . Serious Case Review: Baby Peter . London: LSCBH, 2009. 28. Health & Care Professions Council. Standards of proficiency: Radiographers. London: HCPC, 2013.


29. College of Radiographers. Medical Image Interpretation & Clinical Reporting by Non-Radiologists: The Role of the Radiographer


30. Health & Care Professions Council. Continuing professional development and your registration. London: HCPC, 2012. 31. College of Radiographers. Code of Professional Conduct. London: CoR, 2013.


32. McConnell J, Devaney C, Gordon M, et al. The impact of a pilot education programme on Queensland radiographer abnormality description of adult appendicular musculo-skeletal trauma. Radiography 2012;18(3):184-90.


33. McConnell JR, Webster AJ. Improving radiographer highlighting of trauma films in the accident and emergency department with a short course of study--an evaluation. Brit J Radiol 2000;73(870):608-12.


34. Mackay S. The impact of a short course of study on the performance of radiographers when highlighting fractures on trauma radiographs: ‘‘The Red Dot System’’


. Brit J Radiol 2006;79:468-72.


35. Reeves S, Kitto S, Masiello I. Crew resource management: how well does it translate to an interprofessional healthcare context? J Interprof Care 2013;27(3):207-9.


ABOUT THE AUTHORS Nick Woznitza is a Reporting Radiographer at Homerton University Hospital and a Visiting Lecturer at Canterbury Christ Church University where he is completing a part time PhD examining chest x-ray interpretation by radiographers. He is an accredited consultant practitioner with the College of Radiographers and advanced practitioner with the Australian Institute of Radiography. Nick has authored several e-Learning for Healthcare sessions and is the module editor for the upcoming CT project.


. Eur J .learningtechnologies.co.uk/


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68