Inside District Court
795-402 Jeffrey C. Smith v. Nancy Hassett
Robert J. Fuoco (410) 768-6733 Civil Procedure
Te Honorable Philip T. Caroom Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County
Tis case was brought by the buyer of a waterfront house against the seller, where the buyer alleged that the seller made misrepresentations and breached various warranties of title. Te questions presented in this appeal are whether the trial court erred in denying a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, where the court ruled that the allegations in the second amended complaint were “futile”, and whether the trial court erred when it entered summary judgment against plaintiff ’s claim of a violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act.
796-02073 Clayton W. Hamilton v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Scott M. Rotter (410) 783-9230 Public Employee Worker Compensation/Proximate Causation
Te Honorable Audrey J.S. Carrion Circuit Court for Baltimore County
Tis case revolves around a firefighter who sustained an injury to his shoulder due to a work-related accident. 2 years after that accident, the Maryland Workers’ Compensation Commission found, during a hearing, that the firefighter’s current shoulder complaints were causally related to the accident. Te firefighter appealed this decision to the trial court, which granted summary judgment against the firefighter. Te question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court committed reversible error by misapplying the standard of review for summary judgment or by failing to apply the holding of Williams Construction Company v. Garrison regarding subsequent intervening/superseding cause.
797-02940 Henri Jean Baptiste v. John S. Burson
Human beings are standing by.
Call now.
IME’s, Internal Medicine, Physical Therapy
Richard I. Chaifetz (443) 546-4608 Property Law/Foreclosure
Te Honorable Herman Dawson Circuit Court for Prince George’s County
In a foreclosure proceeding against appellant, appellant alleges that the trial court erred when it failed to vacate the foreclosure sale and dismiss the foreclosure action because appellant had exercised his statutory rights to rescind the loan and contractual rights to arbitrate the issue.
DrGaber.com
341 N. Calvert Street, Suite 300 Baltimore, MD 21202 410.986.4400
1838 Greenetree Road, Suite 445 Pikesville, MD 21208 410.653.8840
Seven Square Office Park 9110 Philadelphia Road, Suite 206 Rosedale, Maryland 21237 410.986.0048
GAB00409_Trial Reporter
Ad2.indd 1 58 Trial Reporter / Summer 2012
Continued on page 60 12/15/09 3:24 PM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68