This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Clinical


defined, is a means to collect and remove excess gases to prevent them from being vented back into the operating room. Installation of an efficient scavenging system is the most important step in reducing trace gas concentrations. It has been demonstrated that ambient concentrations have been lowered by 90 per cent through the use of an efficient system.” The section is quite comprehensive and details trials using various types of then commercially available systems. This was followed by an article published in General Dentistry, September/October 2002 entitled “Clinical Evaluation of the efficacy of three nitrous oxide scavenging units during dental treatment” Certismo, Walton, Hartzell, Farris. It discussed three breathing systems available at that time; Porter-brown, Matrx ANS and Accutron. The findings concurred with the NIOSHH report in determining that the most efficient system was the Porter-brown – the only ‘double mask’ system. Now we come to the universally


accepted standard of what com- prises ‘active’ dental scavenging. The word dental is used quite purposefully, as scavenging for dental application is quite different for that used for general anaes- thesia. This is quite often where the most common misunderstandings occur. The regulations for installa- tion and use of medical gases and anaesthetic gas scavenging are contained within HTM 02-01 published in 2006. However, much of this is concerned with hospital use – operating theatres etc and dental application only receives a very small mention – the addition being made at the 11th hour, so to speak. Dental scavenging is dealt with in Chapter 10 – Anaesthetic Gas Scavenging Disposal Systems and also Appendix L; sections 8, 9 & 10.2


Chapter 10, 10.5 states: “Active


Scavenging for dental installation is an entirely different concept. An active system is one in which there is a flow generated through the patient’s nasal mask and this carries away the waste gases exhaled by the patient. This flow is in the order of 45 L/min and is achieved by connection of the mask (via a suitable flow-limiting adaptor) to either; a dental vacuum system or


directly to an active scavenging system (BS/EN) wall terminal.” This obviously reflects the


information contained in the NIOSH report dating to 2004 and again reflects the types of breathing systems available in the UK today – again the majori- ty of which are manufactured in the USA. However, this does not alter the fact that 45 L/min has found to be the optimum draw rate to min- imise surgery pollution and this has now become a statutory require- ment. This requirement is now being taught in all educational courses pertaining to inhalation sedation, an example of which is a publication published in 2009 by Wiley-Blackwell: Clinical Sedation in DentistryGirdler NM, Hill CM, Wilson KE. Chapter six – Principles and


Practice of Inhalation Sedation, Sub-section Chronic Effects – states: “Active gas scavenging is a statutory requirement during the provision of inhalation sedation with nitrous oxide in the UK. The recognised definition of an active dental scavenging breathing system is an air flow rate of waste gas by the application of low power suction to the expiratory limb of the breathing circuit. “Passive scavenging – Further


ways to reduce trace levels of nitrous oxide include opening a window or door and using floor- level active fan ventilation to the exterior of the building.” It is interesting to reflect at this point how the definition of ‘passive’ scavenging has altered. It used to refer to the breathing system itself but now refers to additional factors that can be brought into play to reduce ambient surgery pollution, such as low level expelair fans and open doors/windows. This brings us to a further element of scavenging; how do you actually achieve and monitor an extraction flow rate of 45 L/min? The initial element is obviously the breathing system itself – one capable of withstanding flow rates of 45 L/min and there are several well recognised models available. The second element is the method of achieving the sustained draw and there are basically three ways: • Use of a BS/EN AGS Wall


Terminal fit with an AGS Adapter. This has to be used with a breath-


Porter Brown Breathing System: lifespan five years with regular use. This is the market leader with 90 per cent of buyers choosing this unit


ing system that has a suitable flow- limiter (often referred to as a vacuum control block). • Use of chairside suction port.


However, the problem here is two- fold. It is most common to employ the high volume suction port which is unpopular and also, the suction has to be capable of offering a sus- tained 45 L/min during the sedation procedure, something which is not always possible. • Use of a separate dedicated


scavenging pump. The size and decibel level of these units has improved significantly in recent years, increasing their popularity. When considering any change


from current scavenging, it is rec- ommended to seek expert advice on the subject, from a company that specialises in inhalation sedation, as expensive mistakes have been made in the past. The subject should be considered as a whole and no one element taken in isolation as this can lead to significant error – a very undesirable factor when dealing with nitrous oxide. This article is designed to offer an understanding to the basic requirements. Further detailed information can be found on the R A Medical Services website: www.ramedical.com


® Scottish note: It is heartening to note that Scotland, when considered against other countries comprising the UK, presently ‘leads’ the way in terms of active dental scavenging as approximately 90 per cent of dentists currently employ an active breathing system during inhalation sedation.


REFERENCES


1: DHSS (NIOSH) Publication no: 94-129 2: Medical Gases Health Technical Memorandum 02-01: Medical gas pipeline systems. Part A: Design, installation, validation and verification. 2006


Scottish Dental magazine 49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76