targeted at the individual groundsman or greenkeeper. “The idea was to produce a trencher which would enable every individual sports facility manager, groundsman and greenkeeper to have an affordable method of implementing their own small scale drainage and irrigation programmes” said Harry. “With the right piece of kit, they would be able to tackle problem areas, small scale new developments and general drainage maintenance issues themselves without the need for an outside contractor.” The result was the AFT 45, introduced at
Saltex ’98 and an immediate success. For the first time there was an affordable trencher that could be sold in high volume to a large ‘end user’ market. The AFT 45 is now the most successful trencher in the company’s stable. Harry’s other strength is in languages, speaking five fluently and understanding the basics of many more. He used this advantage to travel extensively and push ahead with the expansion into exports. “I saw the future of AFT Trenchers primarily in the consolidation of sales in the UK and the rapid expansion of foreign markets”explained Harry. “We can now boast that exports account for 60% of our production. We have strengthened our position by looking at developing countries, such as Algeria, where we recently won one of our largest contracts to supply all the agricultural and sports industry training schools with AFT 45's.” “We have also secured substantial contracts in Russia, Georgia and the Ukraine and have agents all over Europe, as well as in many other countries worldwide operating on our behalf. Japan in particular is developing sports pitches on a large scale and, of course, China is a vast untapped market for the future.”
Record keeping, Health & Safety bogeymen, daily checks, disposing of oil! It’s a fair old rant this month from Terrain Aeration’s David Green
Is it just me or is everyone getting bogged down in the ever increasing complexity of machine maintenance and the associated record keeping. Following my acquisition of the C&P Soilcare machinery assets, I am currently battling with the consequences of the former “maintenance” men who, by the look of the machinery, clearly thought that you fill a grease nipple with a blob of grease applied by fingertip and that daily vehicle checks are just black and white patterns. My capable staff, who have actually built all the equipment I need, are not, however, qualified as mechanics and, so, are not the “technically qualified competent persons” required to do the routine maintenance by our Health & Safety bogeyman. Even I, the designer of every bit of the machinery, am not qualified to be the competent person unless I document my experience. How can I possibly document the accumulated mechanical knowledge of fifty years?
Can I say that my wife bought me a Hydraulics and Pneumatics text book for Christmas and I have read it until the print has worn off! The H&S bogeyman is not
satisfied with my latest certificate, top of the class with distinction on an NVQ course for Health and Safety, my membership of the Institute of Health and Safety as a technician, or the fact that I have been a qualified electrician for years.
None of these are relevant when it comes to installing or maintaining the custom built wiring I have designed for my machinery, despite the fact that I had to tell the manufacturers of the control system I used, that their wiring diagram was incorrect, and having them agree and write back thanking me for correcting their information! I dare not let one of my guys
The sports industry, quite rightly, continues to demand high standards of performance from its facilities indoor and out. The challenge for companies like AFT Trenchers is to maintain a strong profitable business that enables it to invest in new ideas, new methods and constantly look for ways to assist the industry it serves, to achieve the best.
touch any part of a road vehicle or trailer that is safety critical, brakes,
steering etc. because, should he make a mistake that causes an accident, I will be guilty of allowing an “unqualified” person to
do the maintenance on the vehicle that is not only subject to the road traffic requirements, but is also now the employees place of work and subject to much more stringent requirements under Health & Safety regulations. As a result, my local garage has to do all the repairs. Even such minor things as adjusting the hand brake. Well, they are at least qualified experts and I can blame them if anything goes wrong ... wait a minute, does this allow me to discharge my duty of care? Not one bit, unless I can show that I have checked that the local garage is fully competent and maintained records to show those checks!
The daily check recording also gets me. There must be a complete record for the record to be acceptable. Complete? What, including weekends, holidays and times when the vehicle/machinery never turns a wheel? Well technically, yes, for how else can the H&S bogeyman know that the daily checks are being carried out daily? So, that is fourteen machines, three
vehicles, a forklift, a compressor etc. etc., all of which have the same time off at weekends and holidays that the operators do, and are, therefore, available for work on about 200 days a year.
My actual machine usage is 30%, so that
is 165 plus 140 blank sheets per machine per year, and hidden in amongst this mass of over 300 empty sheets are just 60 that show a daily check actually being performed. The H&S inspector may never be found again if he returns and insists on this nonsense.
I am also stuck with the problem of waste oil disposal. I can only store a limited amount without expensive bunded tank provision but, on the other hand, the waste oil disposal companies will not accept small volumes.
What am I to do? Am I to accumulate the
1000 litres (about five years worth of oil changes) that the waste oil company wants and so become a registered waste producer with all the consequent costs, or is there another way to safely dispose of a few tens of litres of oil each year?
Do not suggest that I use the household
waste site disposal facility for this is strictly illegal.
How can I possibly document the accumulated mechanical knowledge of fifty years?
Grumpy
old Git!
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132