A GRAVE ISSUE ...
Many local authority policy makers appear to have taken their eye of the weed control ball and could be in danger of being overrun by weeds in their communities, warns leading independent weed control consultant, Richard Minton.
D
ue to budgetary constraints some local authorities are having to concentrate their weed control
resources on a reactive approach, rather than having in place a proactive management programme. Others have programmes in place but do not have the necessary skills to properly implement and audit them to ensure the quality of service, delivery and value for money are achieved. Either way this approach is false economy. I know contract managers are being told to cut costs and increase revenue whilst, at the same time effectively addressing increasing problems - ‘it isn't possible to do all three’. Reactive and complaint based systems may sound effective and keep individual complainants happy, but policy makers need to understand this does not tackle the majority of weed infestation and the effects this can have to any given area. Damage to structures, encouraging litter and vermin, blocked drains and gullies, are inevitable results of poor weed control and lead to increased costs well above
having the job done properly in the first place.
Current legislation
The recent European Thematic Strategy into the use of pesticides has highlighted the many areas of use in the public sector, not only Local Authorities and utility companies, with all the hard surfaces, shrub beds, grass areas etc., but also the many sports facilities, golf courses, football clubs etc., who rely on pesticides to maintain quality playing surfaces weed, pest and disease free. Pesticides are a management tool and should only be used after all other practices have been considered. The strict registration processes adopted before a pesticide can be considered for use ensure that, when used correctly, the benefits outweigh the environmental concerns. Weed control these days is governed by very strict legislation. The statutory “code of practice for using of plant protection products” has meant there is responsibility on all those making the decisions, in relation to pesticide application, to ensure they are
qualified to do so. From those writing tender specifications, those issuing them, those advising and those undertaking the work there are responsibilities to ensure all legal and Health & Safety requirements are followed to the letter. We must be able to demonstrate we can adopt ‘best practice’ at all times when using pesticides, ensuring all legislation is adhered to and thus avoiding any potential damage or risk of contamination.
Local authorities, sports clubs, golf courses, industrial areas all need to ensure they remain within the law and identify areas to reduce pesticide output.
• Weed control on all hard surfaces - pavements, car parks etc.
• Weed control on shrub beds and around obstacles
• Selective weed control to all grass areas - sports pitches, lawns, roadside verges
• Aquatic weed control - lakes, pools, rivers, canals etc.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115