course manager had a summer roll of around 6 feet he would be hung, drawn and quartered.
So what has changed? I’II tell you what it is. It is the golfers perception of what they think it should be, and the pressure they then bring to bear on the greens committee, who then pass it on to the turf manager. So what’s caused this? Has TV got anything to do with it? The answer has to be yes. Don’t get me wrong I love watching these great golf competitions on those fantastic courses, the ball seems to roll for ever. And there lies the problem, that’s what golfers think is the norm. Never mind that the course may have cost millions to construct and have a budget that would buy a small Caribbean island. Even then, as soon as the competition has finished, heights of cut are taken up and many hours of staff time are spent nursing the course back to health.
I have to admit not all televised golf competitions are held on multi-million pound courses with massive budgets. Look at our Open Championship courses. Can these be compared to your local club? No not at all, why do you think golf started on these perfect pieces of land? Do you think it has anything to do with the superb drainage which goes a long way to help support the best grasses i.e. fescue and bent? If these courses are then maintained properly, which, in my experience they are, the grasses can then give great ball roll without having to cut the greens so short that the turf is damaged So how do the rest of us try to keep up with these demands? Possibly by employing techniques that are not good for the grasses, such as scarifying to the point of thinning the turf or, more likely, cutting the grass lower and lower to the demise of the quality, playing into the hands of annual meadow grass and all the associated problems. I know there are exceptions to the rule, some of the new creeping bent grasses need cutting as low as 3mm to get the best out of them, but most of these, if not all of them, are built to very high standards using the best materials. I’m talking about the majority of golf courses that don’t have the best natural soil which has been used to build pushed up greens with the resulting limited drainage.
During my travels it was hard to spend much time looking at every golf course that we passed as my wife and friends couldn’t care less if the green I was looking at had a bit of thatch, or quite a bit of annual meadow grass. They thought that Big Bertha was a lady we were invited to see doing her thing in a bar in Bangkok!
But the question I had was, is this shaving of the greens to get speed or why else do it? Is it a global thing or is it limited to our fair shores? Well, I have to say we are not on our own. Every country I visited with the excepting of one cut the greens too low. One of the worst examples I saw was in Alice Springs, Australia. This course had the write up of being one of the best desert
golf courses in the world. I couldn’t wait to have a look. Now, I have to say, I didn’t talk to any greens staff regarding actual heights of cut but I know shaved grass when I see it. I had visions of Geoffrey Boycott on his knees sticking his car keys into the green saying, “Ey up, I told you he should have batted first”. The greens were brown and thin, they even had bare patches on some high spots. On one green I noticed from a distance a small green spot, on closer inspection something had caused a small depression, only a mill or two deep, possible caused by an insect or maybe a little thatch fungi, I’m not sure but, because that grass was able to grow that
Colin and his better half - they had it hard!
This may mean that cutting has to be undertaken more often but its well worth it just for the visual aspect. What these enlightened golf clubs have is sustainability, allowing the grasses to perform to their optimum must give the best possible year round conditions. So is all doom and gloom? No I don't think so. I hear of some golf clubs that have taken the Greenkeepers advice and stopped the shaving of the greens taking the heights of cut up to a sensible 4 or 5mm. Sure the greens may not roll quite as far but their still getting stimp readings of 8 to 8.5 feet and noticing all the benefits that go hand in hand with healthy grass.
“If a holy man wants to bless you, let him do it and give him a decent tip. Then you might be spared the coconut falling out of a tree and landing straight on your head!”
extra one or two millimetres it looked so much healthier. The irony is that on this occasion green roll may well have been increased by taking the height of cut ! It should be remembered that ball roll is mainly affected by three things; the firmness of the surface, the grass species and the uniformity and smoothness of the surface. Taking the height of cut up would have certainly allowed the grass to form a smoother playing surface and therefore less resistance to ball roll. That’s not to mention the other benefits such as using less water, less fertiliser and reduced disease threat.
The only country that gets the big thumbs up from yours truly is Canada. Not only did every golf club that I visited cut all their grass areas at reasonable heights even the grass verges along the road side were cut at about 20mm. Unlike ours, that are shaved until the grass is bare or muddy.
You may say it’s alright for you to air your views in a magazine, its quite different putting it in to practice, and I couldn’t agree more. I have, over the years, tried my best to educate some clubs that I have worked at with limited success. Under those circumstances you have to remember who puts the food on the table. There is many a hungry martyr.
My view is that, ultimately, the members should have what they want, after all they pay for it. However, I then decide whether I can work under those conditions or not. All I would say is don’t give in. As the expert at your place of work you are honour bound to keep giving the best advice and hope you have employers who will listen to you. These are my views which have been formed over 30 years, yours may be quite different. Why don’t you write to Laurence at Pitchcare and let him know.
51
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115