PRODUCTION • PROCESSING • HANDLING


Clamp-on ultrasonic flow technology is another alternative, and it offers the cost-effective benefit of externally mounted sensors that do not require pipe alterations or regular maintenance. Te sensors send and receive acoustic signals through the pipe wall and the flowing liquid. A transmitter then calculates flow velocity by measuring the differences in transit time between sound waves transmitted with and against flow, or the frequency shift of the signal as it encounters bubbles or other sonically reflective materials (known as the Doppler effect).


Although some transit-time sensors can measure liquids with minimal levels of aeration, too much will interrupt the ultrasonic signal and send the meter into a fault condition. Doppler mode is capable of measuring flow with higher concentrations of aeration; however, its lower accuracy and repeatability precludes it from being used in most hydrocarbon applications.


CORIOLIS MEASUREMENT Coriolis measurement has long been favoured as the best-performing flow technology available to the industry, particularly for custody-transfer applications. As Coriolis flowmeters calculate mass flow directly, they can achieve very high levels of precision even in rapidly fluctuating process conditions – a crucial advantage when valuable crude is changing hands. But even Coriolis technology is often


hampered by aeration. Most traditional Coriolis meters are able to measure liquids with an aeration content up to approximately 6%. Beyond this range, flow tube damping is likely to occur, and the meter will no longer be able to supply the drive energy and gain necessary to maintain tube oscillation. Many transmitters also cannot respond quickly enough to the constant sensor signal changes stemming from aeration, potentially triggering a stall. In recent years, automation companies


such as Siemens have ramped up investments in Coriolis R&D to better address the needs of the hydrocarbon market. As Siemens embarked on design work for its new digital Coriolis flow


The Sitrans FC430 features an advanced driver circuit with a gain higher than 20 and a high-speed signal refresh rate of 100Hz


systems, the Sitrans FC430 and FC410, a major goal was to improve performance in the presence of aeration – while also reducing operational downtime from aeration-induced meter failure. Both models feature an advanced driver circuit with a gain higher than 20 and a high- speed signal update rate of 100Hz. As a result, the FC430 and FC410 can reliably measure a variety of liquid hydrocarbon applications containing up to 10% aeration, including separators. Coriolis technology has come a long


way, but even the most sophisticated systems have their limitations. In applications where aeration levels exceed 10% (e.g. high-pressure separators and wellheads), it is virtually impossible for a flowmeter to measure with any acceptable level of accuracy and reliability. It is with these particularly challenging installations in mind that Siemens introduced the Gas Void Fraction Eliminator (GVFE). Easily integrated into existing liquid pipelines, the GVFE improves


the performance of any flow metering technology by removing and diverting all varieties of undesirable aeration, including bubbly, annular, slug and stratified flow. Te GVFE is capable of extracting gas under full-flow and full-velocity conditions, making it possible to maintain designated flow rates and efficiency. Its compact footprint requires only minimal usage of space in skids or pads, and by removing aeration from the pipeline, the system also offers added protection against corrosion. Ultimately, whether operators choose to meter the extracted gas separately for alternative use, reintroduce it downstream of the liquid flow or divert it to flare, the innovative GVFE will empower them to create and maintain full control over their value streams l


For more information visit www.siemens.com/gvfe


www.engineerlive.com 33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52