This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RANCHING Business


Mitigation Banking: It Pays to Conserve By Katrina Huffstutler


In the fi rst 2 parts of this year-long series, we have discussed the many benefi ts of a conservation easement — but we’ve also learned they are not free. For some landowners, mitigation banking could be the key to increased revenue on these properties.


A


LL OVER TEXAS, OKLAHOMA AND the southwest, developers are going into once un-


touched spaces in the name of prog- ress. And while this usually disap- points ranchers, there are instances where it pays. Blair Fitzsimons, chief executive


offi cer for Texas Agricultural Land Trust (TALT), says that mitigation banking, which is defi ned as “the restoration, creation, enhancement, or preservation of a wetland, stream or other habitat area undertaken ex- pressly for the purpose of compensat- ing for unavoidable resource losses in advance of development actions, when such compensation cannot be achieved at the development site or would not be as environmentally benefi cial,” has become an increasing part of what the organization does. “Mitigation banking was largely


created to give land developers a way to offset the impacts of land development,” Fitzsimons says. “When a developer is impacting certain natural resources, such as streams, rivers, wetlands, or habitat for an endangered species, they must obtain a permit from a federal agency, either the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The developer may obtain the permit by performing a number of actions to compensate for the adverse impact.” One compensatory act is to purchase credits from


a mitigation bank. The need for these credits in turn creates a market for private lands conservation.


tscra.org


Mitigation banking is defi ned as “the restoration, creation, enhancement, or pres- ervation of a wetland, stream or other habitat area undertaken expressly for the purpose of compensating for unavoidable resource losses in advance of develop- ment actions, when such compensation cannot be achieved at the development site or would not be as environmentally benefi cial.”


She offers this example: A new pipeline is slated to


run through 2 acres of a wetland. The pipeline com- pany must obtain a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to comply with the Clean Water Act, and must compensate for the impact. “It may obtain a permit by protecting and restor-


ing an isolated wetland area near the project, or it can purchase 2-acre credits, if available, from a mitigation bank servicing the geographic area of the project. The purchase of credits streamlines the permit process, and is benefi cial for the resource, because a large


June 2016 The Cattleman 55


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140