This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
washingtonscene


Civics 101 Every year, Congress works on two major types of legislation: authoriza- tion bills and appropria- tions bills. Authorization bills tell federal depart- ments (such as DoD) and agencies what to do. Appropriations bills fund federal agencies.


contributions to retirement accounts, lump-sum proposals, and COLA-reduc- ing measures. One of MOAA’s earliest concerns with


retirement reform proposals was their effect on disabled retirees. Changing the multiplier used to calculate military retirement could diminish a disabled retiree’s pension. DoD officials asked Congress to grandfather disabled retirees under the current system. “This prevents more senior members from receiving less in a disability retirement annuity than the current system,” according to DoD. Defense planners agreed with MOAA that Congress should continue contribu- tions to retirement accounts throughout military service. The Senate’s retirement proposal stops government matching at 20 years. MOAA thinks ending govern- ment contributions at 20 years will deter continued service. DoD also agreed with MOAA’s criti- cisms on potential lump-sum retirement benefits. This option provides a dis- counted, small lump sum while forgoing significant lifetime annuity payments. In a memo to Congress, DoD officials said a lump-sum payment at retirement is a “smart financial decision in very limited circumstances.” MOAA took a stronger stance, equating the payments to unscru- pulous payday lending practices. In exchange for comprehensive retire-


ment reform, DoD also asked Congress to eliminate an unfair penalty on work- ing-age military retirees. Under current law, military entrants who joined after Jan. 1, 2016, will have their future COLAs reduced by one percentage point until age 62. The military said that even by restoring full COLAs, DoD could achieve savings with the new retirement system. “Thankfully, the Pentagon provided


its recommendations in time for House and Senate leaders to consider them


36 MILITARY OFFICER AUGUST 2015


in conference,” says MOAA Director of Government Relations Col. Mike Hayden, USAF (Ret). Though DoD addressed some of


MOAA’s concerns, we’re still worried a 20-percent reduction in retired pay will fail to draw servicemembers to 20 years of service and beyond.


Congress Splits T


on Commissaries Senate bill could slash funding and lead to increased prices.


he Senate took aim at the com- missary system in its version of the National Defense Authoriza-


tion Bill. Senate lawmakers cut $322 million from the commissary budget. A cut this big will lead to increased prices, reduced operating hours and days of op- eration, and a reduction in store staff. Also tucked inside the bill was language allowing DoD to increase prices in stores to cover costs. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) spon-


sored an amendment to restore the $322 million funding and to strike language that would allow DoD to adjust commis- sary prices, but her amendment did not come to a vote. However, as vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Mikulski rejected the commissary cut and provided full funding. In its version of the defense bill, the


House rejected cuts to commissary funding and included full funding for the commis- sary in the defense appropriations bill. What’s next? The Senate currently


is working on its version of the defense appropriations bill. Once passed, it will go to conference, where differences be- tween the House and Senate bills must be resolved.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88