This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
yourviews


MILITARY OFFICER


JUNE 2015 $4.75 THE OFFICIAL MAGAZINE OF MOAA | NEVER STOP SERVINGTM WWW.MOAA.ORG Changes in Europe Given shifts in global


security, has the drawdown of U.S. troops in Europe gone too far? 54


MARKUP WATCH A House subcommittee rejects DoD’s proposed pay and benefit cuts 31


The Russian armor divisions will be going through





for their pre- deployment briefings in the post theater!


the identified U.S. forces are getting dates


Warsaw on their way to Prague while


—Col. Bill Reals, USA (Ret)





MICKEY AND MORE Orlando, Fla., boasts art, foodie trends, and, yes, theme parks 60


U.S. Forces in Europe [“European Downshift,” June 2015] was very accurate and well done in regard to the European downshift and the fact we have gone too far. We do need to have for- ward deployed forces in Germany. They need to bring back two [brigade combat teams] and a combat aviation brigade that is going to be sent to Alaska and forget about unit rotations. I served in Germany during the Cold


War. It is what counterbalanced the Rus- sians. The potential scenario is quite simple. If the Russians decided to take back their former Eastern European coun- tries, or parts thereof, the Russian armor divisions will be going through Warsaw on their way to Prague while the identified U.S. forces are getting dates for their pre- deployment briefings in the post theater! We forget 1968 and the Soviet airborne di- vision in Prague in a matter of hours. —Col. Bill Reals, USA (Ret)


South Coast (Calif.) Chapter, Life Member via email


The article on the imprudent troop re- ductions in Germany and elsewhere in Europe in the June issue of Military Offi- cer magazine is of immense interest to my 84-year-old mother Katharina Joswick, who still vividly recalls the war years in her birthplace of Weiden in der Oberp- falz (near Grafenwoehr), Germany, where she ultimately married my late U.S. Army father, who was at the inception of his military career in Germany in 1948. … Since my father’s death in 2007, my mother and I have continued to return to Germany every autumn and to visit installations such as Grafenwoehr, Vilseck, and Baumholder, where my father was stationed between 1961 and 1964 as a Nike Hercules [missile] offi- cer. That Baumholder is on the verge of being slated for closure is appalling and


14 MILITARY OFFICER AUGUST 2015


unthinkable given the precarious politi- cal climate in Ukraine and in the former Soviet empire.


—John J. Joswick via email


Retirement Reform Concerning the June 5, 2015, [Legisla- tive Update] article, “Will Troops Accept New Retirement Reforms?” As a retired military professional, I personally think going from a pension plan for the active duty to a 401(k) vehicle is a bad idea. We are not civilians who seek employment in an organization with the sole mission of making a profit by selling products and services. We are soldiers, sailors, Marines, and airmen who seek to become part of the profession of arms, to defend the Constitution of the U.S., and — within this context — protect our way of life. That is a huge difference, and loyalty to the military and from the military back to the serviceman is the key pillar. When I was a kid, my dad and all my friends’ dads worked for companies they saw as part of their identity. They were professionals in their field who usually had deep loyalty for their company that had a culture of lifetime employment as a norm with a pension at the end of the day. Conversely, the company benefited by hav- ing a loyal workforce. Employee competence and customer service was higher in past decades; today it usually stinks — the direct result of the disappearance of pensions. Today, the gen- erations that have never known the pen- sion have little loyalty to their company. It is not unusual for them to jump from company to company half a dozen times in just the first decade after college. Maybe that does not matter to the CEO in this new age, but it sure does [matter] where the profession of arms is concerned. It takes decades to grow of-


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88