Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance (continued)
According to AOC Order 32-10, Quarterly Financial Reviews, the Accounting Office or Budget Office staff will investigate differences identified in the quarterly financial review of UDO balances, follow up with the jurisdictions, and notify the appropriate parties if changes are required.
Recommendation
We recommend that AOC’s Procurement Office strengthen its internal controls to ensure that UDO balances for invalid obligations are de-obligated after the goods and services have been delivered and/or the period of performance has ended. In addition, the Accounting Office should work with the Procurement Office to validate information contained in the financial management system and ensure that UDO balances identified as invalid during the quarterly financial reviews are resolved timely.
Management’s Response
Management concurs with the finding and recommendation:
The AOC has long recognized the lack of speed in closing out completed obligations. The AOC has increased staffing for the closeout process by hiring contractors to assist with the closeout process. The backlog of unclosed orders is large but the AOC is committed to closing these orders. The AOC has self- identified this issue and are well on the way to correcting it.
When contractual assistance was brought on in August 2012, they began the task of de-obligating/closing out contracts/task orders from as far back as 2002. In concert with the contractors and AMMD personnel, the expectation is that by the end of FY ’15, the AOC will be nearly caught up if not completely caught up with de-obligating old contracts/task orders. Some historical information below from the last two fiscal years:
Fiscal Year 2013: total contracts/task orders de-obligated/closed – 1,468. Total funds de-obligated: $8,265,542.63.
Fiscal Year 2014: total contracts/task orders de-obligated/closed – 4,473. Total funds de-obligated: $22,435,191.66.
Finding 3: Improperly Recorded Costs Associated With the O’Neill Building Leasehold Improvements
Summary Status: Significant Deficiency New
AOC does not have adequate internal controls to ensure that costs incurred related to construction work-in-progress (CWIP) for leasehold improvements are recorded timely and accurately. AOC entered into Reimbursable Work Authorization (RWA) agreements with the General Services Administration (GSA) for leasehold improvements related to an operating lease for the O’Neill Building. GSA billed AOC on a monthly basis in accordance with the terms of the RWA for costs incurred (e.g., accruals, vendor payments), including a 4 percent project management fee. On April 1, 2014, the leasehold improvements were completed, and the accumulated costs were reclassified from a CWIP account into a capital asset account and depreciated; however, the incurred costs related to the five GSA RWAs for the O’Neill Building leasehold improvements were incorrectly reported as a UDO as of September 30, 2014. Based on the misstatement identified by the auditors, AOC recorded an accounts payable accrual to recognize the $16.9 million in unpaid costs related to the leasehold improvements.
The Green Book states that internal control activities occur at all levels and functions of the entity. They include a wide range of diverse control activities that management should establish, such as approvals, reconciliations, authorizations, and verifications, to ensure that all transactions are completely and accurately recorded. They also
6
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184