RESEARCH I REVIEW PV is consistently better than expected
PV SYSTEMS IN GERMANY are regularly generating higher yields than expected. An investigation by Fraunhofer ISE links these higher yields to an upward trend in solar radiation, pointing out that the current radiation level in Germany is considerably higher than the average values of the last 30 years. As these average values have generally been used in yield predictions up to now, actual PV system yields are exceeding their forecasts by approximately five percent, making them more cost-effective than anticipated. To take this effect into account, Freiburg researchers have adapted their quality assurance services for PV systems and are now basing their yield predictions on solar radiation data from the last ten years.
Up until now, experts have based their solar resource assessments on the assumption that possible radiation levels in the future will not significantly differ from the average values of the last few decades. However, solar radiation is undergoing long-term trends – known as »global dimming and brightening« – which cause average radiation values to change over time. These changes are caused by
factors such as increases and decreases in air pollution and the concentration of aerosols in the atmosphere.
In collaboration with ETH Zurich and Germany’s National Meteorological Service (DWD), researchers at Fraunhofer ISE have conducted scientific research on the extent to which past average values deviate from today’s radiation levels and how these deviations will impact yield predictions for solar installations. The team analyzed DWD’s radiation measurement data (spanning from 1951 to 2010) on selected locations in Germany. The results show that solar radiation has been increasing since around the mid-1980s (brightening), with current radiation levels at the locations under observation measured at around five percent higher than the average value between 1951 and 2010.
Annual deviations in solar radiation from the average value in Germany between 1951-2010 (moving average: black line). Linear trend of the dimming and brightening phase: green/blue line. The 30-year average value is lower than the current level of radiation. The 10-year
average value is only slightly lower than the current level of radiation.
These findings prompted researchers at Fraunhofer ISE to analyze yield predictions for PV power plants being monitored by the institute, which uncovered similar deviations between past yield assessments and actual radiation and yield measurements. “Relying on average radiation values from the past 30 years causes a systematical underestimation of actual PV system yields in Germany by around five percent,” said Björn Müller, project leader at Fraunhofer ISE. “We expect that other regions experiencing the brightening effect are seeing similar underestimations.”
The investigation results are now methodically included in Fraunhofer ISE’s yield predictions. In order to more realistically assess investments in future PV system projects, the quality assurance specialists have decided to use a modified data base for their yield predictions. They now use satellite derived solar radiation time series from the last ten full years, which depict the increase in solar radiation, thus reducing underestimations caused as a result of this. “Our yield forecasts are based on satellite data from the past decade, which enables us to determine the profitability of PV systems more effectively than before,” said Klaus Kiefer, head of the department Quality Assurance PV Modules and Systems at Fraunhofer ISE.
“They provide an improved decision support, for example when buying or reevaluating a PV power plant. Conducting further analyses when reevaluating PV systems can also help to significantly reduce investment risks.”
©2014 Permission required. Angel Business Communications Ltd.
72
www.solar-international.net I Issue V 2014
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80