This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ADVERTISING FEATURE


Chinese,


Japanese, Russian, Korean and Tai


full-text collections can be queried in the native language, while English-speaking users can also search across the large collection of stored English machine translations to retrieve patents.


Many patent databases today facilitate searching in different languages, and PatBase incorporates sophisticated cross-lingual search tools, some developed in cooperation with WIPO, as well as providing the search interface itself in different languages. PatBase is currently available in English, Japanese and Chinese, while the Express version comes in seven languages.


The next step Visualisation and analysis is increasingly a crucial part of a patent search. While having access to comprehensive patent information is important, today’s users are demanding more from a patent database. Organisations need to be able to extract relevant and meaningful information and visualise trends from patent data in order to make strategic decisions.


Online patent search tools such as PatBase—the global patent database developed by Minesoſt and RWS Group—have made the exploitation of these huge quantities of patent information more time and cost-effective, but challenges remain to effectively harnessing the power of patent information. One of the greatest obstacles is the language barrier.


According to the same WIPO report, continued rapid filing growth in China is the main driver behind the overall global increase in patent filings. Significant growth was also reported at the IP offices of the Russian Federation, Mexico, Brazil and Germany, among others—all of which means increasing quantities of published in many different languages.


patent data


PatBase, launched a decade ago, was the first Western searchable patent system to provide a non-Latin language search engine, allowing users to conduct searches in their native language across the extensive non-Latin patent collection.


www.worldipreview.com .worldipr


Since patent documents are purposely draſted to be difficult to interpret, it is vital that tools exist to help understand patent search results. Te need to carefully and manually read through the patent document will never disappear, particularly for patent legal professionals, but automatic patent


analysis can be useful to


obtain a rapid overview of technology trends or competitor patenting activities.


Te main commercial patent databases currently on offer have


developed integrated patent


information analysis tools, allowing analyses to be performed directly on retrieved patent search results. At the end of 2013, Minesoſt and RWS Group announced the launch of PatBase Analytics, allowing predefined analysis templates to be applied to up to 100,000 records at one time.


Te new module allows competitor and product analyses to be performed directly in PatBase, without needing to extract data


for use in


third-party patent-analysis soſtware. As with other patent analysis solutions, large amounts of complex patent data can be quickly analysed and represented in a graphical way that is easy to understand and has a visual appeal ideal for inclusion in reports and presentations (see Figure 1). Standalone patent analysis soſtware also exists


Whether it is in-built analysis tools or dedicated soſtware,


patent information analysis—or


‘patinformatics’, as it is also known—enables users to gain valuable insights that can lead to faster decision-making and inform business strategy. Trends and relationships on a macro level can be uncovered that would not be perceptible when working with patents on a document by document basis.


Keeping track While analysis of patent information provides a snapshot in time (or over a period of time) for a technology area or a competitor patent portfolio, ongoing monitoring


of patent


information offers a way to maintain current awareness and ensure competitive advantage in the marketplace.


In the past, tracking the status of patent


applications (either a company’s own filings or its competitors’) presented a time-consuming manual task but web-based monitoring services are available that have automated the process. Minesoſt’s PatentTracker tool, for example, tracks changes to a variety of patent registers and automatically sends an email alert whenever there is any change to the status of a patent application or a patent family. Te service runs on the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),


World Intellectual Property Review Annual 2014 45


for information specialists wishing to carry out more in-depth analyses, and most patent database providers will support links to directly export search results from their databases into third party tools such as Intellixir or VantagePoint.


Figure 1: Keyword visualisation using PatBase Analytics


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172