This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
gram, like getting approval from accrediting bodies so stu- dents’ licensure was unaffected. But there was no short- age of students eager to sign up for the program, whose individual United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) scores are on par with national averages. And one year less of medical school, plus a Texas Tech scholarship designated for F-MAT students, adds up to only half the usual amount of medical debt.


He acknowledges the program is rigorous and not for ev-


ery student, part of the reason eligible students are screened to test their maturity level. “We’re not in favor of all medical schools going to three years. We’re just advocating that if a certain group can do medical school beautifully in three years, we want to encourage them to do primary care.” In fall 2012, The University of Texas System began pilot- ing a similar initiative that aims to better coordinate stu- dents’ transition from college to medical school and shorten that total time in school by one to two years. Steven Li- eberman, MD, who oversees the initiative as senior dean for administration at the UT Medical Branch at Galveston, says those segments “are very disjointed, and there’s not a lot of intentional integration. That introduces inefficiencies and makes things longer and more expensive than they have to be.”


Under the so-called Transformation in Medical Educa- tion (TIME) initiative, 11 UT institutions, both undergradu- ate and medical schools, experiment with different formats that expose students to medicine and clinical training much sooner. Rather than requiring extended study in chemistry in college, for example, schools merge those courses and allow students to take more classes in biomedicine or even a pharmacology class. In addition to revised general sci- ence requirements in the premedical phase, students begin to learn some basic principles of patient safety and quality improvement and to practice teamwork.


“If we ask them to memorize a whole bunch of chemistry


and regurgitate it to get into medical school, that’s what they will do. If, on the other hand, we ask them to take a patient history and communicate with patients and demon- strate that before they transition to medical school, they can be a contributing member of the health care team from day one,” Dr. Lieberman said. Recognizing that young college students may lack the personal and professional maturity to handle more clinically focused training, schools integrate professional development into their training. “Traditionally, students are invited to come and hang out with us [doctors] and see what we do and learn to act like us through imitation or osmosis, and we expect them to grow up to be good doctors like we are,” Dr. Lieberman said. “This is about making that maturation an explicit and inten- tional process.”


Those students also could get lost in growing classrooms


as Texas medical schools meet AAMC’s call to increase en- rollments 30 percent by 2015. UT Southwestern wants to make sure students leave just as prepared without getting


December 2013 TEXAS MEDICINE 31


BOB DAEMMRICH


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68