achieve, although in many ways it’s a tortured concept because some believe that achieving balance isn’t possible.


Eastern: But it’s safe to say that everyone interprets this in his or her own way?


Orrange: Yes. Certainly coming out of the more interpreta- tive area of social science—balance is different for different people.


Eastern: I read an article in a business jour- nal that essentially said the idea of work- family balance was a cop-out for people who don’t want to work hard. What’s your reaction to that point of view?


intrusion of electronic devices and the idea that you can be connected to your employer at all times. Are scholars looking at this as an area of research?


Orrange: Tat really is about family and gender transformations in society. It’s coming from the struggle to rethink this more traditional yet dominant cultural notion about family, about the bread- winner/homemaker family, where the breadwinner went out into the workforce and earned a wage and the organization assumed that there was someone at home taking care of the family side of things. And therefore the organization, culturally, could count on the breadwinner prety much to give whatever was needed to get the job done. Tose traditional notions created expectations. Today, we have a range of family forms, from dual-earner couples to single head of household fami- lies. In today’s business world, there’s a strong split between work and home, especially when we start thinking of manage- rial jobs and higher-level professions, where there’s tension around how much commitment is enough. What is the nature of commitment? Is it marked by face time? By being present? We’re living in a time now where good jobs are hard to


come by, and that shiſts in many ways the balance of power. Tere’s a power dynamic in society—bargaining power. We’re not all just free and equal individuals operating or negotiat- ing on the same level with corporations, who are much more powerful than any person or individual.


Eastern: When I think of work-family balance, I think of the


“Is technology feeing us? Or is it a tether? It does allow you to do some things fom home, but at the same time that tether is


there and it can affect your mood and well- being. As a society we really haven’t had time to digest


this and debate the ramifications.”


Orrange: Tat has definitely been a growing and prominent interest area. Is technology freeing us? Or is it a tether? It does allow you to do some things from home, but at the same time that tether is there and it can affect your mood and well-being. As a society we really haven’t had time to digest this and de- bate the ramifications. I do worry about the younger genera- tions who grow up with these devices as toys and adopt these things as a total way of life. When they enter the workforce they might get a shock, that things are different when you’re really dealing with work and your for- mal responsibilities. How do we understand these two realms?


How do we get our peace of mind? How do we create a satisfying life? Sometimes it does mean shuting off the connection to work commitments for a period of time to be in a different space—socially, psychologically, and physically.


Eastern: Some employees put in long hours— nights, weekends—and wear it like a badge of honor. How much of this is the culture of the time we live in versus the culture of the place where we work?


Orrange: Once again, when you start to move up the hierar- chy within any organization, long hours can be a measure of commitment, and at times it can be a false measure. But it’s a measure that’s oſten used informally, and so the notion of “we’re working hard, we’re puting in all of these hours,”—they call it “face time” in the literature—it can have implications. As you move toward different levels of an organization, the challenges and the tensions and dynamics are different. Being there at the table to have your voice heard becomes important in the decision-making process as you move up the hierarchy. It affects things like the ability to telecommute, which some people value. What are we doing? What are our goals? What commitments are we making? What resources will be devoted to the way we drive this next project? Tat’s something that doesn’t come out as much as it should in the literature. 3


Eastern | SUMMER 2013 13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44